Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2421 - 2430 of 16451 for commenting.
Search results 2421 - 2430 of 16451 for commenting.
COURT OF APPEALS
general range for sentence imposed). The circuit court’s sentencing comments satisfy this standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36518 - 2006-03-21
general range for sentence imposed). The circuit court’s sentencing comments satisfy this standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36518 - 2006-03-21
COURT OF APPEALS
at sentencing. ¶12 Charles’ seventh and eighth allegations involve the PSI’s comments about his writings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34224 - 2008-10-06
at sentencing. ¶12 Charles’ seventh and eighth allegations involve the PSI’s comments about his writings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34224 - 2008-10-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by the prosecutor at the plea hearing. The circuit court asked the prosecutor to comment, without violating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103931 - 2017-09-21
by the prosecutor at the plea hearing. The circuit court asked the prosecutor to comment, without violating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103931 - 2017-09-21
Victoria A. Badzinski v. Merle Patnode
REMORTERED.” The report also provided “additional comments” stating: (1) “D[i]vert down spouts AWAY from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4939 - 2009-04-12
REMORTERED.” The report also provided “additional comments” stating: (1) “D[i]vert down spouts AWAY from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4939 - 2009-04-12
COURT OF APPEALS
criminal law.[7] Riley does not attempt to convince us otherwise. ¶14 As to Schultz’s comment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30071 - 2007-08-27
criminal law.[7] Riley does not attempt to convince us otherwise. ¶14 As to Schultz’s comment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30071 - 2007-08-27
State v. Gregory L.S.
,” and the accompanying comment.[7] The instruction provides: In answering the question in the special verdict, you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4342 - 2005-03-31
,” and the accompanying comment.[7] The instruction provides: In answering the question in the special verdict, you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4342 - 2005-03-31
State v. Carroll D. Watkins
that at about 10:30 p.m., shortly after Dorr and Null left their room, he commented on the fact that Malone had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2122 - 2005-03-31
that at about 10:30 p.m., shortly after Dorr and Null left their room, he commented on the fact that Malone had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2122 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
when the State made the following comment while discussing the jury instructions on the failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50427 - 2010-06-01
when the State made the following comment while discussing the jury instructions on the failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50427 - 2010-06-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to a comment in Detective Pasho’s testimony that he argues is inadmissible and prejudicial. Second, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1042535 - 2025-11-25
to a comment in Detective Pasho’s testimony that he argues is inadmissible and prejudicial. Second, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1042535 - 2025-11-25
[PDF]
State v. Gregory L.S.
—CHILDREN 180, “Appropriate Date for Jury’s Finding,” and the accompanying comment. 7 The instruction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4342 - 2017-09-19
—CHILDREN 180, “Appropriate Date for Jury’s Finding,” and the accompanying comment. 7 The instruction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4342 - 2017-09-19