Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24201 - 24210 of 82613 for case codes/1000.
Search results 24201 - 24210 of 82613 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
State v. David W. Oakley
2001 WI 123 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 99-3328-CR COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17588 - 2017-09-21
2001 WI 123 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 99-3328-CR COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17588 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
from this and two other cases. The State also agreed to cap its aggregate sentence recommendation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145008 - 2015-07-27
from this and two other cases. The State also agreed to cap its aggregate sentence recommendation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145008 - 2015-07-27
[PDF]
State v. Carl E. V.
concludes that the facts of this case most closely resemble those in State v. Young, 212 Wis.2d 417, 569
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13146 - 2017-09-21
concludes that the facts of this case most closely resemble those in State v. Young, 212 Wis.2d 417, 569
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13146 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
in a reasonable mind. ¶11 Rotzien also argues that Waldner was a close case and that his case is “much closer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29097 - 2007-05-16
in a reasonable mind. ¶11 Rotzien also argues that Waldner was a close case and that his case is “much closer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29097 - 2007-05-16
C & C Pawnbrokers, LLC v. City of Eau Claire
The plaintiffs-appellants in this case, to whom we will collectively refer as the pawnbrokers, filed a complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7639 - 2005-03-31
The plaintiffs-appellants in this case, to whom we will collectively refer as the pawnbrokers, filed a complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7639 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
2008 WI 49 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2007AP67-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32862 - 2008-05-28
2008 WI 49 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2007AP67-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32862 - 2008-05-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
) the sentence imposed by the court. We conclude that there is at least one issue in this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149129 - 2017-09-21
) the sentence imposed by the court. We conclude that there is at least one issue in this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149129 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
ability to defend this case.” Bauer’s inspection was subsequently scheduled for December 14, 2007
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37722 - 2014-09-15
ability to defend this case.” Bauer’s inspection was subsequently scheduled for December 14, 2007
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37722 - 2014-09-15
State v. Milton L. Wright
not err by declaring a mistrial in this case because there was a manifest necessity for it. Wright
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12903 - 2008-02-06
not err by declaring a mistrial in this case because there was a manifest necessity for it. Wright
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12903 - 2008-02-06
COURT OF APPEALS
, based on this particular case, that I talked with Mr. Parr on more than one occasion about the nature
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109979 - 2014-04-07
, based on this particular case, that I talked with Mr. Parr on more than one occasion about the nature
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109979 - 2014-04-07