Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24201 - 24210 of 30014 for de.
Search results 24201 - 24210 of 30014 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
evidence. We review the sufficiency of the evidence de novo, but in the light most favorable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=338620 - 2021-02-24
evidence. We review the sufficiency of the evidence de novo, but in the light most favorable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=338620 - 2021-02-24
COURT OF APPEALS
as to “whether those changes are substantial is a question of law which we review de novo.” Id. ¶30
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102554 - 2013-10-07
as to “whether those changes are substantial is a question of law which we review de novo.” Id. ¶30
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102554 - 2013-10-07
[PDF]
Rite-Hite Corporation v. Board of Review of the Village of Brown Deer
court's thoughtful and comprehensive written decision, our review is de novo. See id., 164 Wis.2d at 42
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11657 - 2017-09-19
court's thoughtful and comprehensive written decision, our review is de novo. See id., 164 Wis.2d at 42
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11657 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
requires interpretation of the statutes, which is a matter of law we review de novo. See Frisch v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106010 - 2017-09-21
requires interpretation of the statutes, which is a matter of law we review de novo. See Frisch v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106010 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
). Although we ordinarily review questions of law de novo, we afford some deference to the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71237 - 2011-09-21
). Although we ordinarily review questions of law de novo, we afford some deference to the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71237 - 2011-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
the constitutional protection against double jeopardy is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32170 - 2008-03-19
the constitutional protection against double jeopardy is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32170 - 2008-03-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
de novo, using the same methodology as does the circuit court. See Heaton v. Mountin, 2000 WI App
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=597477 - 2022-12-06
de novo, using the same methodology as does the circuit court. See Heaton v. Mountin, 2000 WI App
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=597477 - 2022-12-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
or deny summary judgment de novo. Hardy v. Hoefferle, 2007 WI App 264, ¶6, 306 Wis. 2d 513, 743 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=198063 - 2017-10-19
or deny summary judgment de novo. Hardy v. Hoefferle, 2007 WI App 264, ¶6, 306 Wis. 2d 513, 743 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=198063 - 2017-10-19
John W. Kneubuhler II v. Labor & industry Review Commission
.2d 57, 62 (1996) (de novo review, with no deference to agency, is appropriate when issue is one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12723 - 2005-03-31
.2d 57, 62 (1996) (de novo review, with no deference to agency, is appropriate when issue is one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12723 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the defendant’s right to effective assistance of counsel is a legal determination, which this court decides de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190510 - 2017-09-21
the defendant’s right to effective assistance of counsel is a legal determination, which this court decides de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190510 - 2017-09-21