Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24201 - 24210 of 29823 for des.
Search results 24201 - 24210 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
State v. Steven R. Horton
de novo. See Winiarski v. Miicke, 186 Wis.2d 409, 412, 521 N.W.2d 162, 164 (Ct. App. 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7742 - 2017-09-19
de novo. See Winiarski v. Miicke, 186 Wis.2d 409, 412, 521 N.W.2d 162, 164 (Ct. App. 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7742 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
] review de novo. If the motion raises such facts, the circuit court must hold an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63726 - 2014-09-15
] review de novo. If the motion raises such facts, the circuit court must hold an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63726 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to be free from double jeopardy has been violated is a question of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=368612 - 2021-05-25
to be free from double jeopardy has been violated is a question of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=368612 - 2021-05-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶9. If the defendant’s motion “does
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=770901 - 2024-03-05
to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶9. If the defendant’s motion “does
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=770901 - 2024-03-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law for de novo review. Id. ¶21 Klinkenberg makes four ineffective-assistance-of-counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=153579 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law for de novo review. Id. ¶21 Klinkenberg makes four ineffective-assistance-of-counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=153579 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Robert Carnemolla
de novo, State v. Keith, 216 Wis.2d 61, 69, 573 Wis.2d 888, 892-93 (Ct. App. 1997), and the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14622 - 2017-09-21
de novo, State v. Keith, 216 Wis.2d 61, 69, 573 Wis.2d 888, 892-93 (Ct. App. 1997), and the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14622 - 2017-09-21
State v. Joseph C. Frey
the defendant is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. A defendant is prejudiced if he or she can
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8721 - 2005-03-31
the defendant is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. A defendant is prejudiced if he or she can
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8721 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
¶14 We review de novo the circuit court’s decision to deny James’ petition for discharge filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699307 - 2023-09-06
¶14 We review de novo the circuit court’s decision to deny James’ petition for discharge filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699307 - 2023-09-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
or deny summary judgment de novo. Hardy v. Hoefferle, 2007 WI App 264, ¶6, 306 Wis. 2d 513, 743 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=198063 - 2017-10-19
or deny summary judgment de novo. Hardy v. Hoefferle, 2007 WI App 264, ¶6, 306 Wis. 2d 513, 743 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=198063 - 2017-10-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review the grant or denial of summary judgment de novo, and we apply the same standard as does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193169 - 2017-09-21
review the grant or denial of summary judgment de novo, and we apply the same standard as does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193169 - 2017-09-21