Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24201 - 24210 of 57351 for id.
Search results 24201 - 24210 of 57351 for id.
COURT OF APPEALS
any inconsistent allegations therein. Id., ¶15. Whether a complaint states a claim upon which relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90572 - 2012-12-12
any inconsistent allegations therein. Id., ¶15. Whether a complaint states a claim upon which relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90572 - 2012-12-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the “sufficiency of the evidence test” standard. Id., ¶13. We will affirm the circuit court’s finding
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=772727 - 2024-03-06
the “sufficiency of the evidence test” standard. Id., ¶13. We will affirm the circuit court’s finding
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=772727 - 2024-03-06
State v. John G. Anderson
and that it might be considered sound trial strategy. See id. at 689. Strategic choices made after thorough
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16301 - 2005-03-31
and that it might be considered sound trial strategy. See id. at 689. Strategic choices made after thorough
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16301 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
or omissions were not the result of reasonable professional judgment. Id. at 690. However, “every effort
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107529 - 2014-01-29
or omissions were not the result of reasonable professional judgment. Id. at 690. However, “every effort
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107529 - 2014-01-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
as a matter of law.” Id. at 507. No. 2024AP968-CR 4 Yao cannot meet his burden. In essence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=940351 - 2025-04-16
as a matter of law.” Id. at 507. No. 2024AP968-CR 4 Yao cannot meet his burden. In essence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=940351 - 2025-04-16
State v. James Bessert
. Id. at 533-34 (footnote omitted).[4] ¶5 We acknowledge that the supreme court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3899 - 2005-03-31
. Id. at 533-34 (footnote omitted).[4] ¶5 We acknowledge that the supreme court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3899 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
exercises its discretion to impose a DNA surcharge. See id., 2008 WI App 80, ¶¶9–10, 312 Wis. 2d at 207–209
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60547 - 2011-02-28
exercises its discretion to impose a DNA surcharge. See id., 2008 WI App 80, ¶¶9–10, 312 Wis. 2d at 207–209
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60547 - 2011-02-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Id. at 697. To establish prejudice, a defendant must show a reasonable probability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168117 - 2017-09-21
. Id. at 697. To establish prejudice, a defendant must show a reasonable probability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168117 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
the defendant beyond the legal justification for the traffic stop invalidated the search. See id., ¶¶21-23
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47930 - 2014-09-15
the defendant beyond the legal justification for the traffic stop invalidated the search. See id., ¶¶21-23
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47930 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
is ambiguous, and the principal function of the investigative stop is to quickly resolve that ambiguity.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29097 - 2014-09-15
is ambiguous, and the principal function of the investigative stop is to quickly resolve that ambiguity.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29097 - 2014-09-15