Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24201 - 24210 of 46087 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 24201 - 24210 of 46087 for paternity test paper work.
[PDF]
NOTICE
is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id. The test for ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54755 - 2014-09-15
is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id. The test for ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54755 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, a convicted person must satisfy the two-prong test set forth in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989780 - 2025-07-29
, a convicted person must satisfy the two-prong test set forth in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989780 - 2025-07-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). The prejudice prong of the Strickland test is satisfied when the attorney’s error is of such magnitude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106032 - 2017-09-21
). The prejudice prong of the Strickland test is satisfied when the attorney’s error is of such magnitude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106032 - 2017-09-21
State v. William Medina
N.W.2d 369, 372 (Ct. App. 1993) (affirmative defenses may be waived). The test for ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13376 - 2005-03-31
N.W.2d 369, 372 (Ct. App. 1993) (affirmative defenses may be waived). The test for ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13376 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Gregory M. Davis
. 1990). The question of what constitutes reasonable suspicion is a common sense test: under all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11438 - 2017-09-19
. 1990). The question of what constitutes reasonable suspicion is a common sense test: under all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11438 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
not prove the prejudice prong of the Strickland test. This court also rejects Huck’s ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15522 - 2017-09-21
not prove the prejudice prong of the Strickland test. This court also rejects Huck’s ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15522 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
provided at the plea hearing. Id. If the defendant satisfies this test, the burden then shifts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46617 - 2014-09-15
provided at the plea hearing. Id. If the defendant satisfies this test, the burden then shifts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46617 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
injustice test is met if a defendant receives ineffective assistance of counsel. State v. Bentley, 201
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164090 - 2017-09-21
injustice test is met if a defendant receives ineffective assistance of counsel. State v. Bentley, 201
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164090 - 2017-09-21
State v. Bruce Knutson
to give testimony necessary to a fair trial. Id. at 126. The test for the necessity of the testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3163 - 2005-03-31
to give testimony necessary to a fair trial. Id. at 126. The test for the necessity of the testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3163 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Kristoffer A. Ashmore
-CR 6 ¶11 The test for ineffective assistance of counsel has two elements: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14864 - 2017-09-21
-CR 6 ¶11 The test for ineffective assistance of counsel has two elements: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14864 - 2017-09-21