Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24201 - 24210 of 58928 for quit claim deed.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to a postconviction hearing on a motion claiming ineffective assistance of counsel if the defendant “fails to allege
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644956 - 2023-04-18

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
court awarded Matenaer approximately $71,500 in damages on Matenaer’s claims against Peterson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147900 - 2017-09-21

State v. Michael Marks
by a prisoner and an order denying his postconviction motion. He claims his double jeopardy, speedy trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6725 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Redevelopment Authority of the City of Milwaukee v. Diane Viverette
Clearance Act. Uptown claims that the trial court erred in so ruling because the testing and inspection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14402 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Redevelopment Authority of the City of Milwaukee v. Uptown Arts and Education, Inc.
Clearance Act. Uptown claims that the trial court erred in so ruling because the testing and inspection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14401 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, 866 N.W.2d 758, and claiming ineffective assistance of trial counsel based on trial counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195275 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
attorney was ineffective for failing to introduce available evidence that she claims was essential
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39668 - 2009-08-17

[PDF] Terry J. Huffman v. Irvin Kroenke
that the open and obvious danger defense is inapplicable to his claim based upon negligence per se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12658 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. James E. Szulczewski
under § 971.17, STATS.1 Defendant also claims the application of the enhanced penalties for battery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10802 - 2017-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS
$71,500 in damages on Matenaer’s claims against Peterson. The circuit court concluded that Peterson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147900 - 2015-09-02