Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24211 - 24220 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 24211 - 24220 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
State v. Thomas M. Raab
. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion alleging ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12479 - 2017-09-21
. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion alleging ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12479 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
from an order denying his motion for a new trial. The issues are whether postconviction counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28209 - 2014-09-15
from an order denying his motion for a new trial. The issues are whether postconviction counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28209 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Robert C. Green
the orders denying his motion for postconviction relief. He contends that the trial court erred in denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14952 - 2017-09-21
the orders denying his motion for postconviction relief. He contends that the trial court erred in denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14952 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 974.06 (2017-18)1 motion for postconviction relief. Johnson asserts that his appellate counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256704 - 2020-05-27
. § 974.06 (2017-18)1 motion for postconviction relief. Johnson asserts that his appellate counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256704 - 2020-05-27
[PDF]
Frontsheet
. ¶3 Green filed a motion to dismiss the case with prejudice, arguing retrial would violate his right
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=674263 - 2023-06-29
. ¶3 Green filed a motion to dismiss the case with prejudice, arguing retrial would violate his right
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=674263 - 2023-06-29
[PDF]
WI App 97
pursuant to this court’s award of $1003.20 in costs against him on an appeal concerning a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64703 - 2014-09-15
pursuant to this court’s award of $1003.20 in costs against him on an appeal concerning a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64703 - 2014-09-15
2010 WI APP 39
denying his motion to reverse the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress. He further contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45283 - 2010-03-30
denying his motion to reverse the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress. He further contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45283 - 2010-03-30
[PDF]
WI APP 39
and from a postconviction order denying his motion to reverse the trial court’s denial of his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45283 - 2014-09-15
and from a postconviction order denying his motion to reverse the trial court’s denial of his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45283 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
for Burnett County: KENNETH L. KUTZ, Judge. Affirmed; motions granted and cause remanded with directions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145487 - 2015-07-30
for Burnett County: KENNETH L. KUTZ, Judge. Affirmed; motions granted and cause remanded with directions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145487 - 2015-07-30
COURT OF APPEALS
by a felon count. In a postconviction motion, Smith moved for a new trial based on newly-discovered evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41513 - 2009-09-28
by a felon count. In a postconviction motion, Smith moved for a new trial based on newly-discovered evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41513 - 2009-09-28