Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24211 - 24220 of 29823 for des.
Search results 24211 - 24220 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
Karen Lee Boldt v. James Edward Boldt, Jr.
, and the division of the frequent flier tickets. The trial court conducted a de novo hearing on November 18-19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24826 - 2017-09-21
, and the division of the frequent flier tickets. The trial court conducted a de novo hearing on November 18-19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24826 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Timothy Ziebart
to a hearing is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. at 310. ¶27 In the instant case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2700 - 2017-09-19
to a hearing is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. at 310. ¶27 In the instant case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2700 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
facts entitling the defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=491787 - 2022-03-08
facts entitling the defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=491787 - 2022-03-08
[PDF]
State v. John S. Cooper
review de novo. See State v. Piddington, 2001 WI 24, ¶13, 241 Wis. 2d 754, 623 N.W.2d 528, cert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5587 - 2017-09-19
review de novo. See State v. Piddington, 2001 WI 24, ¶13, 241 Wis. 2d 754, 623 N.W.2d 528, cert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5587 - 2017-09-19
State v. Richard G. White
that we review de novo. Id., 153 Wis. 2d at 128, 449 N.W.2d at 848. We give special scrutiny
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6424 - 2005-03-31
that we review de novo. Id., 153 Wis. 2d at 128, 449 N.W.2d at 848. We give special scrutiny
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6424 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert J. Defliger
in evaluating the sufficiency of a criminal complaint or information, which is a question of law we decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4277 - 2005-03-31
in evaluating the sufficiency of a criminal complaint or information, which is a question of law we decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4277 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 133
appeals. ¶6 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28773 - 2014-09-15
appeals. ¶6 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28773 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Elwyn O. Jarvis v. James F. Gonring
was frivolously brought. Aside from the fact that the argument is attenuated, we deem the matter de minimis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7712 - 2017-09-19
was frivolously brought. Aside from the fact that the argument is attenuated, we deem the matter de minimis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7712 - 2017-09-19
State v. Charles Edward Hennings
On our de novo review, we agree with the postconviction court that the trial lawyer’s strategy was within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19667 - 2005-09-19
On our de novo review, we agree with the postconviction court that the trial lawyer’s strategy was within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19667 - 2005-09-19
[PDF]
Faye Meyer v. The Laser Vision Institute, LLC
of law which this court reviews de novo. Id. at 923. COMPLAINT ¶4 On December 15, 2004, Meyer filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21525 - 2017-09-21
of law which this court reviews de novo. Id. at 923. COMPLAINT ¶4 On December 15, 2004, Meyer filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21525 - 2017-09-21