Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24211 - 24220 of 29823 for des.
Search results 24211 - 24220 of 29823 for des.
State v. Robert J. Defliger
in evaluating the sufficiency of a criminal complaint or information, which is a question of law we decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4277 - 2005-03-31
in evaluating the sufficiency of a criminal complaint or information, which is a question of law we decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4277 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 133
appeals. ¶6 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28773 - 2014-09-15
appeals. ¶6 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28773 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Elwyn O. Jarvis v. James F. Gonring
was frivolously brought. Aside from the fact that the argument is attenuated, we deem the matter de minimis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7712 - 2017-09-19
was frivolously brought. Aside from the fact that the argument is attenuated, we deem the matter de minimis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7712 - 2017-09-19
State v. Charles Edward Hennings
On our de novo review, we agree with the postconviction court that the trial lawyer’s strategy was within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19667 - 2005-09-19
On our de novo review, we agree with the postconviction court that the trial lawyer’s strategy was within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19667 - 2005-09-19
[PDF]
Faye Meyer v. The Laser Vision Institute, LLC
of law which this court reviews de novo. Id. at 923. COMPLAINT ¶4 On December 15, 2004, Meyer filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21525 - 2017-09-21
of law which this court reviews de novo. Id. at 923. COMPLAINT ¶4 On December 15, 2004, Meyer filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21525 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court was objectively biased presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=527537 - 2022-06-01
the circuit court was objectively biased presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=527537 - 2022-06-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the constitutional standard for ineffective assistance of counsel is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131518 - 2017-09-21
the constitutional standard for ineffective assistance of counsel is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131518 - 2017-09-21
2010 WI APP 175
this, it seems axiomatic that this is a question of law which we must review de novo. Indeed, Tody points out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56998 - 2010-12-13
this, it seems axiomatic that this is a question of law which we must review de novo. Indeed, Tody points out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56998 - 2010-12-13
Douglas M. Weed v. Steven P. Anderson
judgment. An appeal of a summary judgment ruling raises an issue of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11412 - 2005-03-31
judgment. An appeal of a summary judgment ruling raises an issue of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11412 - 2005-03-31
State v. Raymond D. Wilson
will review it de novo. “An appellate court decides questions of law independently without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11764 - 2005-03-31
will review it de novo. “An appellate court decides questions of law independently without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11764 - 2005-03-31