Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24221 - 24230 of 30247 for de.
Search results 24221 - 24230 of 30247 for de.
[PDF]
WI APP 24
are undisputed, is a question of law; it is therefore a question we decide de novo. See Patrickus v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27899 - 2014-09-15
are undisputed, is a question of law; it is therefore a question we decide de novo. See Patrickus v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27899 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 86
the Commission’s order is de novo. See City of Brookfield v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission, 87 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83767 - 2014-09-15
the Commission’s order is de novo. See City of Brookfield v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission, 87 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83767 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI App 171
the change is substantial is a question of law which we review de novo. Dahlke v. Dahlke, 2002 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29379 - 2014-09-15
the change is substantial is a question of law which we review de novo. Dahlke v. Dahlke, 2002 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29379 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 145
of Marcella De Peters, Milwaukee. Respondent ATTORNEYS: On behalf of the plaintiff-respondent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28883 - 2014-09-15
of Marcella De Peters, Milwaukee. Respondent ATTORNEYS: On behalf of the plaintiff-respondent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28883 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 310, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996). If the motion raises
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93205 - 2014-09-15
review de novo. State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 310, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996). If the motion raises
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93205 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and denying Elnimeiry’s motion to modify child support. ¶20 Elnimeiry timely moved for a de novo hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=773791 - 2024-03-07
and denying Elnimeiry’s motion to modify child support. ¶20 Elnimeiry timely moved for a de novo hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=773791 - 2024-03-07
City of Sun Prairie v. William D. Davis
violates an order that he be present are purely questions of law, which we will review de novo. See W.W.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12588 - 2005-03-31
violates an order that he be present are purely questions of law, which we will review de novo. See W.W.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12588 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for ineffective assistance is “a question of law that this court decides de novo.” State v. Domke, 2011 WI 95
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=792608 - 2024-04-24
for ineffective assistance is “a question of law that this court decides de novo.” State v. Domke, 2011 WI 95
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=792608 - 2024-04-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The Cobbs’ appeal of summary judgment ¶15 This court reviews a summary judgment decision de novo, using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=365941 - 2021-05-11
. The Cobbs’ appeal of summary judgment ¶15 This court reviews a summary judgment decision de novo, using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=365941 - 2021-05-11
Randy A. J. v. Norma I. J.
construction of statutes is a question of law that we review de novo. Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis. 2d 361
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4959 - 2005-03-31
construction of statutes is a question of law that we review de novo. Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis. 2d 361
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4959 - 2005-03-31