Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24231 - 24240 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
Search results 24231 - 24240 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
was not ineffective. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010475 - 2025-09-17
was not ineffective. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010475 - 2025-09-17
[PDF]
State v. Michael W. Slinker
in Sheboygan County. Subsequently, Slinker successfully appealed the Sheboygan County case; it was dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3938 - 2017-09-20
in Sheboygan County. Subsequently, Slinker successfully appealed the Sheboygan County case; it was dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3938 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for reasonable suspicion. See id. ¶3 Courts “‘decide on a case-by-case basis, evaluating the totality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250652 - 2019-11-27
for reasonable suspicion. See id. ¶3 Courts “‘decide on a case-by-case basis, evaluating the totality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250652 - 2019-11-27
State v. Steven E. Benash
was necessary for the State to prove its case, and permitted the State to reopen the hearing. The State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9448 - 2005-03-31
was necessary for the State to prove its case, and permitted the State to reopen the hearing. The State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9448 - 2005-03-31
State v. Samuel L. Hogan
at the Machner hearing. He stated that he did not use an investigator in this case, but asked Hogan to supply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11514 - 2005-03-31
at the Machner hearing. He stated that he did not use an investigator in this case, but asked Hogan to supply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11514 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 18, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY ¶2 While unusual, the history of this case is not in dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26834 - 2006-10-17
AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY ¶2 While unusual, the history of this case is not in dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26834 - 2006-10-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for the limited purposes specified in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). In these consolidated cases, Denzil R. Crosby
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1059484 - 2026-01-13
for the limited purposes specified in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). In these consolidated cases, Denzil R. Crosby
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1059484 - 2026-01-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
) the defendant was not negligent in seeking evidence; (3) the evidence is material to an issue in the case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226157 - 2018-10-30
) the defendant was not negligent in seeking evidence; (3) the evidence is material to an issue in the case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226157 - 2018-10-30
Town of Wautoma v. City of Wautoma
of annexation. In particular, § 66.021(12) provides that in cases where—as here—a petition for direct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12026 - 2005-03-31
of annexation. In particular, § 66.021(12) provides that in cases where—as here—a petition for direct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12026 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition, and we summarily affirm. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=414413 - 2021-08-24
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition, and we summarily affirm. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=414413 - 2021-08-24