Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24231 - 24240 of 40146 for financial disclosure statements.
Search results 24231 - 24240 of 40146 for financial disclosure statements.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
statement by the district attorney at the sentencing after revocation hearing was inaccurate: While he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=300358 - 2020-10-29
statement by the district attorney at the sentencing after revocation hearing was inaccurate: While he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=300358 - 2020-10-29
[PDF]
Karl Julius James v. Gary R. McCaughtry
that he made the “go to the hole” statement. Based on James’s admission and the conduct report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12811 - 2017-09-21
that he made the “go to the hole” statement. Based on James’s admission and the conduct report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12811 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
rampage. The evidence at trial included the testimony and prior statements of the victims, testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213114 - 2018-05-23
rampage. The evidence at trial included the testimony and prior statements of the victims, testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213114 - 2018-05-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2017, and he gave an inculpatory statement in which he admitted his participation in robbing K.K
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256587 - 2020-03-12
2017, and he gave an inculpatory statement in which he admitted his participation in robbing K.K
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256587 - 2020-03-12
[PDF]
Mark Johnson (Deceased) v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
. 1988). Although the Attorney General argues that the difference between LIRC’s statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13012 - 2017-09-21
. 1988). Although the Attorney General argues that the difference between LIRC’s statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13012 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
. Pretrial motions to reveal the identity of the CI[3] and to suppress statements Burns made to police were
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101751 - 2013-09-10
. Pretrial motions to reveal the identity of the CI[3] and to suppress statements Burns made to police were
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101751 - 2013-09-10
Ronald J. Rucks v. George Burnett
.” (Emphasis added.) These statements do not allude to a “12 foot” easement; nor do they allude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15035 - 2005-03-31
.” (Emphasis added.) These statements do not allude to a “12 foot” easement; nor do they allude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15035 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Shane C. Reinhart v. Peggy S. Reinhart
to statements made by the children that indicated that it was Peggy who spoke poorly about Shane, not vice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16179 - 2017-09-21
to statements made by the children that indicated that it was Peggy who spoke poorly about Shane, not vice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16179 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
discount.” Houston relies on a statement by Torzala, who told the trial court: “The rent is [$]460
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32887 - 2008-06-02
discount.” Houston relies on a statement by Torzala, who told the trial court: “The rent is [$]460
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32887 - 2008-06-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not to testify; (6) the jury instructions; (7) the parties’ opening statements and closing arguments; and (8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1053778 - 2025-12-23
not to testify; (6) the jury instructions; (7) the parties’ opening statements and closing arguments; and (8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1053778 - 2025-12-23