Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24241 - 24250 of 30247 for de.

State v. Richard G. White
that we review de novo. Id., 153 Wis. 2d at 128, 449 N.W.2d at 848. We give special scrutiny
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6424 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
was violated is a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Darby, 2009 WI App 50, ¶13, 317 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186355 - 2017-09-21

State v. Charles Edward Hennings
On our de novo review, we agree with the postconviction court that the trial lawyer’s strategy was within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19667 - 2005-09-19

Brennan v. Berner Cheese Corporation
review summary judgments de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Machotka v. Village
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6346 - 2005-03-31

State v. Avery L. Dallapiazza
was not entered knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently is a question of “constitutional fact” that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4615 - 2005-03-31

[PDF]
, Handley points to Jimmie R.R., which sets forth the de novo standard of review for this particular
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=984177 - 2025-07-17

WI App 72 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2008AP1884 Complete Title of C...
of law we review de novo. Strassman, 225 Wis. 2d at 788. When interpreting a statute, we discern
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36214 - 2011-02-07

Craig I. Halverson v. June E. Halverson
is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. Hokin, 231 Wis. 2d at 191 ¶9. ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2801 - 2005-03-31

State v. Glenn E. Davis
permissible presents a question of law subject to de novo review. See Maday, 179 Wis. 2d at 353. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3197 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. § 893.89, which is a question of law we review de novo. Mair v. Trollhaugen Ski Resort, 2006 WI 61
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=767768 - 2024-02-22