Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24241 - 24250 of 29713 for des.
Search results 24241 - 24250 of 29713 for des.
State v. Michael A. DeLain
interpretation of § 940.22(2). Interpretation of a statute is a question of law that we review de novo. Johnson
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17911 - 2005-05-02
interpretation of § 940.22(2). Interpretation of a statute is a question of law that we review de novo. Johnson
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17911 - 2005-05-02
Frontsheet
they are found to be clearly erroneous, but we review the referee's conclusions of law on a de novo basis. In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98502 - 2013-06-25
they are found to be clearly erroneous, but we review the referee's conclusions of law on a de novo basis. In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98502 - 2013-06-25
[PDF]
Patricia K. Bernhardt v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
§ 108.04(5) is a legal conclusion, which we review de novo. See Charette v. LIRC, 196 Wis.2d 956, 959
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10149 - 2017-09-19
§ 108.04(5) is a legal conclusion, which we review de novo. See Charette v. LIRC, 196 Wis.2d 956, 959
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10149 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
No. 2023AP650-CR 8 de novo. See State v. Vesper, 2018 WI App 31, ¶38, 382 Wis. 2d 207, 912 N.W.2d 418
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1047911 - 2025-12-09
No. 2023AP650-CR 8 de novo. See State v. Vesper, 2018 WI App 31, ¶38, 382 Wis. 2d 207, 912 N.W.2d 418
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1047911 - 2025-12-09
Karen Suchomel v. University of Wisconsin Hospital & Clinics
involves a question of law which we review de novo. Hughes v. Chrysler Motors Corp., 197 Wis. 2d 973, 978
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20007 - 2005-12-11
involves a question of law which we review de novo. Hughes v. Chrysler Motors Corp., 197 Wis. 2d 973, 978
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20007 - 2005-12-11
Randy A. J. v. Norma I. J.
construction of statutes is a question of law that we review de novo. Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis. 2d 361
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4959 - 2005-03-31
construction of statutes is a question of law that we review de novo. Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis. 2d 361
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4959 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Reginald R. Jones
at the time he gave his consent presents a question of constitutional fact which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7094 - 2017-09-20
at the time he gave his consent presents a question of constitutional fact which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7094 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
his child would very likely experience by visiting him in prison.” Schroeder requested de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68993 - 2014-09-15
his child would very likely experience by visiting him in prison.” Schroeder requested de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68993 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review a grant of summary judgment de novo. See Schreiner v. Wieser Concrete Prods., Inc., 2006 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240331 - 2019-05-07
review a grant of summary judgment de novo. See Schreiner v. Wieser Concrete Prods., Inc., 2006 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240331 - 2019-05-07
State v. John Patrick Feeney
the statute of limitations has expired presents us with a question of law we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20657 - 2005-12-19
the statute of limitations has expired presents us with a question of law we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20657 - 2005-12-19