Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24251 - 24260 of 34007 for dismissal.
Search results 24251 - 24260 of 34007 for dismissal.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
3 charge dismissed but read in for sentencing purposes. He was sentenced to 9 months
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=984598 - 2025-07-22
3 charge dismissed but read in for sentencing purposes. He was sentenced to 9 months
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=984598 - 2025-07-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
to a crime. The State agreed to dismiss the remaining charges and not to charge Paznonski with any other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30166 - 2014-09-15
to a crime. The State agreed to dismiss the remaining charges and not to charge Paznonski with any other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30166 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
prior possession charges in the past, each of which ended with a break: one charge was dismissed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113853 - 2014-06-02
prior possession charges in the past, each of which ended with a break: one charge was dismissed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113853 - 2014-06-02
State v. Patrick Martin
court order also dismissed the criminal complaint charging Martin with possession of drug paraphernalia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16029 - 2005-03-31
court order also dismissed the criminal complaint charging Martin with possession of drug paraphernalia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16029 - 2005-03-31
State v. Craig A. Zempel
as third offenses. Zempel moved to dismiss the complaint on the grounds that, for several reasons, it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14285 - 2005-03-31
as third offenses. Zempel moved to dismiss the complaint on the grounds that, for several reasons, it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14285 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment. ¶3 After Dudka’s first appeal was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because he appealed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80439 - 2014-09-15
judgment. ¶3 After Dudka’s first appeal was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because he appealed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80439 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in this court via a motion to dismiss when Sandra commenced the appeal. We denied the motion, explaining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135536 - 2017-09-21
in this court via a motion to dismiss when Sandra commenced the appeal. We denied the motion, explaining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135536 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, concluding the State was unable to meet its burden of going forward. The State then moved to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191967 - 2017-09-21
, concluding the State was unable to meet its burden of going forward. The State then moved to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191967 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
guilty, and dismissed but read in the remaining eight counts. After sentencing, Duvall filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644887 - 2023-04-19
guilty, and dismissed but read in the remaining eight counts. After sentencing, Duvall filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644887 - 2023-04-19
John J. Pemper v. John J. Hoel
of an insured under the policy and moved for summary judgment to dismiss it from the case. The circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6762 - 2005-03-31
of an insured under the policy and moved for summary judgment to dismiss it from the case. The circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6762 - 2005-03-31