Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24251 - 24260 of 58267 for speedy trial.
Search results 24251 - 24260 of 58267 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Robert N. Pendleton
. Pendleton contends that the trial court failed to advise him that sexual intercourse was an element
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11232 - 2017-09-19
. Pendleton contends that the trial court failed to advise him that sexual intercourse was an element
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11232 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to object to what he believes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235529 - 2019-02-26
that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to object to what he believes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235529 - 2019-02-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
hearing. The no-merit report addresses: (1) whether A.W. received a fair trial and disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146209 - 2017-09-21
hearing. The no-merit report addresses: (1) whether A.W. received a fair trial and disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146209 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Matthew A. Bennett
facility and asks that we “direct the trial court to amend its judgment of conviction to order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15329 - 2017-09-21
facility and asks that we “direct the trial court to amend its judgment of conviction to order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15329 - 2017-09-21
State v. Amany E.
adjudicated her delinquent. She claims the trial court erred in concluding that it lacked the authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2244 - 2005-03-31
adjudicated her delinquent. She claims the trial court erred in concluding that it lacked the authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2244 - 2005-03-31
Tyrone Hill v. Dean Medical Center
expert testimony is a matter of trial court discretion, review of which is limited to determining whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11625 - 2005-03-31
expert testimony is a matter of trial court discretion, review of which is limited to determining whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11625 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Kevin Radman v. Darlene Gustafson
and Kevin Radman. Gustafson argues that the trial court’s finding that the parties had no meeting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4225 - 2017-09-19
and Kevin Radman. Gustafson argues that the trial court’s finding that the parties had no meeting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4225 - 2017-09-19
State v. Michael P. Schoenberg
contention is that the trial court gave an instruction regarding his blood sample which created a mandatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15610 - 2014-04-07
contention is that the trial court gave an instruction regarding his blood sample which created a mandatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15610 - 2014-04-07
[PDF]
State v. Daniel C. Clussman
argues that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to request and secure a jury instruction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13554 - 2017-09-21
argues that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to request and secure a jury instruction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13554 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Bashar Elramahi
and correctly exercised its discretion. Sentencing is within the sound discretion of the trial court and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14239 - 2014-09-15
and correctly exercised its discretion. Sentencing is within the sound discretion of the trial court and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14239 - 2014-09-15