Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24261 - 24270 of 98507 for civil court case status online.
Search results 24261 - 24270 of 98507 for civil court case status online.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
In this case, the County argued—and the circuit court agreed—that Travis was dangerous under WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=380742 - 2021-06-29
In this case, the County argued—and the circuit court agreed—that Travis was dangerous under WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=380742 - 2021-06-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review the question independently of the circuit court’s determination.” Id. ¶9 In this case, both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=654431 - 2023-05-11
review the question independently of the circuit court’s determination.” Id. ¶9 In this case, both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=654431 - 2023-05-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Wis. 2d 503, 992 N.W.2d 853 (this court decides cases on the narrowest possible grounds).
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=766422 - 2024-02-21
Wis. 2d 503, 992 N.W.2d 853 (this court decides cases on the narrowest possible grounds).
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=766422 - 2024-02-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 11, 2025 Samuel A. Christensen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1035807 - 2025-11-11
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 11, 2025 Samuel A. Christensen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1035807 - 2025-11-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 16, 2022 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=484577 - 2022-02-16
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 16, 2022 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=484577 - 2022-02-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
required by McCallum. In that case, the supreme court concluded that the recanting witness’s affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156190 - 2017-09-21
required by McCallum. In that case, the supreme court concluded that the recanting witness’s affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156190 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
district. We agree with the County and the circuit court that, under the facts of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141551 - 2017-09-21
district. We agree with the County and the circuit court that, under the facts of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141551 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 12, 2019 Sheila T. Reiff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246633 - 2019-09-12
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 12, 2019 Sheila T. Reiff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246633 - 2019-09-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 9, 2016 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177794 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 9, 2016 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177794 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
) Such other factors as the court may in each individual case determine to be relevant. These factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=550909 - 2022-08-03
) Such other factors as the court may in each individual case determine to be relevant. These factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=550909 - 2022-08-03

