Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24261 - 24270 of 30001 for de.
Search results 24261 - 24270 of 30001 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS
in the law presents a legal question to be reviewed de novo. State ex rel. Robinson v. Town of Bristol, 2003
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144176 - 2015-07-08
in the law presents a legal question to be reviewed de novo. State ex rel. Robinson v. Town of Bristol, 2003
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144176 - 2015-07-08
Ronald W. Morters v. Charles H. Barr
of summary judgment, this court reviews the record de novo, applying the same standard and following the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4232 - 2005-03-31
of summary judgment, this court reviews the record de novo, applying the same standard and following the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4232 - 2005-03-31
2010 WI APP 175
this, it seems axiomatic that this is a question of law which we must review de novo. Indeed, Tody points out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56998 - 2010-12-13
this, it seems axiomatic that this is a question of law which we must review de novo. Indeed, Tody points out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56998 - 2010-12-13
COURT OF APPEALS
subject to de novo review. See id., ¶9. “If the motion raises such facts, the [trial] court must hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108906 - 2014-03-10
subject to de novo review. See id., ¶9. “If the motion raises such facts, the [trial] court must hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108906 - 2014-03-10
Brennan v. Berner Cheese Corporation
review summary judgments de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Machotka v. Village
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6346 - 2005-03-31
review summary judgments de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Machotka v. Village
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6346 - 2005-03-31
State v. Charles Edward Hennings
On our de novo review, we agree with the postconviction court that the trial lawyer’s strategy was within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19667 - 2005-09-19
On our de novo review, we agree with the postconviction court that the trial lawyer’s strategy was within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19667 - 2005-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. Estate of Hegarty ex rel. Hegarty v. Beauchaine, 2001 WI App 300, ¶14, 249 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64340 - 2014-09-15
review de novo. Estate of Hegarty ex rel. Hegarty v. Beauchaine, 2001 WI App 300, ¶14, 249 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64340 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
to interpret and apply condemnation statutes to undisputed facts. This is a question of law for our de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36258 - 2014-09-15
to interpret and apply condemnation statutes to undisputed facts. This is a question of law for our de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36258 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in a given case is a question of law that we review de novo.” State v. Koller, 2001 WI App 253, ¶32, 248
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228770 - 2018-12-04
in a given case is a question of law that we review de novo.” State v. Koller, 2001 WI App 253, ¶32, 248
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228770 - 2018-12-04
[PDF]
State v. Michael B. Borhegyi
of constitutional dimensions which is reviewed de novo. State v. Ziegenhagen, 73 Wis.2d 656, 664, 245 N.W.2d 656
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13676 - 2017-09-21
of constitutional dimensions which is reviewed de novo. State v. Ziegenhagen, 73 Wis.2d 656, 664, 245 N.W.2d 656
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13676 - 2017-09-21