Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24261 - 24270 of 28806 for f.
Search results 24261 - 24270 of 28806 for f.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a maximum of twenty-three years and six months of imprisonment. See WIS. STAT. §§ 941.30(1), 939.50(3)(f
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=353334 - 2021-04-06
a maximum of twenty-three years and six months of imprisonment. See WIS. STAT. §§ 941.30(1), 939.50(3)(f
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=353334 - 2021-04-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 2013 WI 69, ¶32, 349 Wis. 2d 274, 833 N.W.2d 146 (“[F]iling a Cherry motion does not procedurally bar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113805 - 2017-09-21
, 2013 WI 69, ¶32, 349 Wis. 2d 274, 833 N.W.2d 146 (“[F]iling a Cherry motion does not procedurally bar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113805 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. 9 The following day, the ALJ issued a written decision stating: “[F]or the reasons stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107537 - 2017-09-21
. 9 The following day, the ALJ issued a written decision stating: “[F]or the reasons stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107537 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. “[I]f the motion does not raise facts sufficient to entitle the movant to relief, or presents only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=640834 - 2023-04-04
. “[I]f the motion does not raise facts sufficient to entitle the movant to relief, or presents only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=640834 - 2023-04-04
[PDF]
NOTICE
-RESPONDENT, V. KASEE E. KRUEGER F/K/A KASEE E. BIEVER, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29404 - 2014-09-15
-RESPONDENT, V. KASEE E. KRUEGER F/K/A KASEE E. BIEVER, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29404 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (2013-14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141392 - 2017-09-21
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (2013-14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141392 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Wendy S. Zeka v. Gary R. Zeka
expert relied on the asking prices of properties that had not been sold. ¶20 “[I]f a finder of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3204 - 2017-09-19
expert relied on the asking prices of properties that had not been sold. ¶20 “[I]f a finder of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3204 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Oscar Anderson, Jr.
conduct. See United States v. Rutledge, 900 F.2d 1127, 1130-31 (7th Cir. 1990) (police allowed to play
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11740 - 2014-09-15
conduct. See United States v. Rutledge, 900 F.2d 1127, 1130-31 (7th Cir. 1990) (police allowed to play
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11740 - 2014-09-15
2008 WI APP 136
, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 961.41(1m)(e)1, 939.50(3)(f), 939.05, 939.62(1)(c) (2005-06)[2] and manufacture
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33680 - 2008-09-23
, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 961.41(1m)(e)1, 939.50(3)(f), 939.05, 939.62(1)(c) (2005-06)[2] and manufacture
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33680 - 2008-09-23
State v. James P. Henderson
“reasonabl[e] belie[f] that such force [was] necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2249 - 2005-03-31
“reasonabl[e] belie[f] that such force [was] necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2249 - 2005-03-31