Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24261 - 24270 of 38076 for ph d.
Search results 24261 - 24270 of 38076 for ph d.
State v. Rocky J. Shaw
son and five-year-old daughter were in the back seat. Shaw cites 7 Daniel D
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11135 - 2005-03-31
son and five-year-old daughter were in the back seat. Shaw cites 7 Daniel D
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11135 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
2 police. See WIS. STAT. § 974.05(1)(d)3. (2007-08).1 The State claims the circuit court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55524 - 2014-09-15
2 police. See WIS. STAT. § 974.05(1)(d)3. (2007-08).1 The State claims the circuit court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55524 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Tina H.
by the court.” Section 48.415(2)(b)2. “‘[D]iligent effort’ means an earnest and conscientious effort
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13019 - 2017-09-21
by the court.” Section 48.415(2)(b)2. “‘[D]iligent effort’ means an earnest and conscientious effort
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13019 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
from an order of the circuit court for Door County: D. T. EHLERS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54929 - 2014-09-15
from an order of the circuit court for Door County: D. T. EHLERS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54929 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT III STATE OF WISCONSIN EX REL. JAMIE D. JARDINE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49112 - 2014-09-15
IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT III STATE OF WISCONSIN EX REL. JAMIE D. JARDINE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49112 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Kelly J. Kloss
the defendant’s refusal was “proper.” See § 343.305(10)(a). (“If the court determines under sub. (9)(d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15248 - 2017-09-21
the defendant’s refusal was “proper.” See § 343.305(10)(a). (“If the court determines under sub. (9)(d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15248 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
argues the “[d]efendant has no right to demand enforcement of a plea agreement with a prosecutor until
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27332 - 2014-09-15
argues the “[d]efendant has no right to demand enforcement of a plea agreement with a prosecutor until
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27332 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
a court’s exercise of discretion “if the court applie[d] the proper standard of law and, using
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=961376 - 2025-05-28
a court’s exercise of discretion “if the court applie[d] the proper standard of law and, using
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=961376 - 2025-05-28
State v. David G. Huusko
for Eau Claire County: benjamin d. proctor, Judge. Affirmed. Before Cane, C.J., Hoover, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26441 - 2006-09-11
for Eau Claire County: benjamin d. proctor, Judge. Affirmed. Before Cane, C.J., Hoover, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26441 - 2006-09-11
COURT OF APPEALS
asked Holan whether he understood that he “face[d] $21,000 in fines and six years in prison?” Holan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77416 - 2012-01-30
asked Holan whether he understood that he “face[d] $21,000 in fines and six years in prison?” Holan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77416 - 2012-01-30