Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24271 - 24280 of 30014 for de.
Search results 24271 - 24280 of 30014 for de.
[PDF]
Joyce A. Devenport v. Paper Recycling Company
was recreational as defined by statute. ¶8 We review the grant or denial of a motion for summary judgment de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15330 - 2017-09-21
was recreational as defined by statute. ¶8 We review the grant or denial of a motion for summary judgment de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15330 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Samuel Jones
we review de novo. See State v. Ziegenhagen, 73 Wis.2d 656, 664, 245 N.W.2d 656, 660 (1976
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12857 - 2017-09-21
we review de novo. See State v. Ziegenhagen, 73 Wis.2d 656, 664, 245 N.W.2d 656, 660 (1976
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12857 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, in cases where the postjudgment court did not preside over the trial, we review its findings of fact de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251234 - 2019-12-17
, in cases where the postjudgment court did not preside over the trial, we review its findings of fact de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251234 - 2019-12-17
[PDF]
Northern States Power Company v. National Gas Company, Inc.
627, 654, 517 N.W.2d 432, 443 (1994). We review questions of law de novo, while benefiting from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15609 - 2017-09-21
627, 654, 517 N.W.2d 432, 443 (1994). We review questions of law de novo, while benefiting from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15609 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and Smith’s arguments are purely legal and we review such arguments de novo. To the extent Valek and Smith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95615 - 2014-09-15
and Smith’s arguments are purely legal and we review such arguments de novo. To the extent Valek and Smith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95615 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Erik Jensen v. David D. McPherson, M.D.
involves the interpretation of a statute, a question of law which we review de novo. See Agnes T. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4533 - 2017-09-19
involves the interpretation of a statute, a question of law which we review de novo. See Agnes T. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4533 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
summary judgment submissions ¶13 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo. Chapman v. B.C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=365801 - 2021-05-11
summary judgment submissions ¶13 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo. Chapman v. B.C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=365801 - 2021-05-11
[PDF]
Town of Norway Sanitary District #1 v. Racine County Drainage Board of Commissioners
of statutory interpretation. Statutory interpretation is a question of law which we may review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13085 - 2017-09-21
of statutory interpretation. Statutory interpretation is a question of law which we may review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13085 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. David J. Pizzini
is a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Turner, No. 99-2548-CR 6 136 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16041 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Turner, No. 99-2548-CR 6 136 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16041 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Titus Graham
to be reviewed de novo. Id. If the motion fails to allege sufficient facts, then the trial court has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24635 - 2017-09-21
to be reviewed de novo. Id. If the motion fails to allege sufficient facts, then the trial court has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24635 - 2017-09-21