Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24271 - 24280 of 81947 for order for a biological sample for drug testing.
Search results 24271 - 24280 of 81947 for order for a biological sample for drug testing.
COURT OF APPEALS
suspicion is a common sense test: under all the facts and circumstances present, what would a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34556 - 2008-11-11
suspicion is a common sense test: under all the facts and circumstances present, what would a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34556 - 2008-11-11
COURT OF APPEALS
and an order of the circuit court for La Crosse County: john j. perlich, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30890 - 2007-11-14
and an order of the circuit court for La Crosse County: john j. perlich, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30890 - 2007-11-14
[PDF]
NOTICE
omitted). “The question of what constitutes reasonable suspicion is a common sense test: under all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34556 - 2014-09-15
omitted). “The question of what constitutes reasonable suspicion is a common sense test: under all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34556 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Paul L. Minnig
. APPEAL from and order of the circuit court for Dodge County: ANDREW P. BISSONNETTE, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7466 - 2017-09-20
. APPEAL from and order of the circuit court for Dodge County: ANDREW P. BISSONNETTE, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7466 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Walworth County: KRISTINE E. DRETTWAN, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245224 - 2019-08-21
a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Walworth County: KRISTINE E. DRETTWAN, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245224 - 2019-08-21
State v. Frank Starich
sobriety tests, arrested him for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant.[2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3041 - 2005-03-31
sobriety tests, arrested him for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant.[2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3041 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
: “[I]n order to satisfy the ‘some evidence’ test, a person claiming necessity in justification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96321 - 2014-09-15
: “[I]n order to satisfy the ‘some evidence’ test, a person claiming necessity in justification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96321 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46617 - 2010-02-09
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46617 - 2010-02-09
Wisconsin Power and Light Company v. Langlade County Board of Adjustment
. 1994). On certiorari, we apply the substantial evidence test to determine whether the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8922 - 2005-03-31
. 1994). On certiorari, we apply the substantial evidence test to determine whether the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8922 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
part of the test is whether application of issue preclusion would be “fundamentally unfair.” Michelle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62849 - 2011-04-13
part of the test is whether application of issue preclusion would be “fundamentally unfair.” Michelle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62849 - 2011-04-13