Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24291 - 24300 of 29713 for des.
Search results 24291 - 24300 of 29713 for des.
Town of Neenah Sanitary District No. 2 v. City of Neenah
are different.[4] ¶7 We review a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. Weigel v. Grimmett
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4393 - 2005-03-31
are different.[4] ¶7 We review a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. Weigel v. Grimmett
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4393 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Erik Jensen v. David D. McPherson, M.D.
involves the interpretation of a statute, a question of law which we review de novo. See Agnes T. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4533 - 2017-09-19
involves the interpretation of a statute, a question of law which we review de novo. See Agnes T. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4533 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Randall Seltrecht v. Christine A. Bremer
court's grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11130 - 2017-09-19
court's grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11130 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. Schroeder, 237 Wis. 2d 575, ¶8. ¶18 Turning to the facts, Estrada knew that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239253 - 2019-04-18
de novo. Schroeder, 237 Wis. 2d 575, ¶8. ¶18 Turning to the facts, Estrada knew that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239253 - 2019-04-18
COURT OF APPEALS
unless clearly erroneous but reviewing de novo whether those facts warrant suppression. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54389 - 2010-09-13
unless clearly erroneous but reviewing de novo whether those facts warrant suppression. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54389 - 2010-09-13
[PDF]
WI APP 158
. II. ¶6 Our review of a trial court’s grant or denial of summary judgment is de novo. Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29099 - 2014-09-15
. II. ¶6 Our review of a trial court’s grant or denial of summary judgment is de novo. Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29099 - 2014-09-15
State v. Timothy Ziebart
entitling a defendant to a hearing is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. at 310
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2700 - 2005-03-31
entitling a defendant to a hearing is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. at 310
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2700 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
de novo the legal question whether those facts meet the legal standard for standing. See id., ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33800 - 2008-09-23
de novo the legal question whether those facts meet the legal standard for standing. See id., ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33800 - 2008-09-23
Kathleen M. Taylor v. Marshall & Ilsley Trust Company
of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we apply the same standards as did the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4440 - 2005-03-31
of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we apply the same standards as did the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4440 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
SCR CHAPTER 21
whether to investigate and to prosecute de minimis violations. Discretion permits the office
/sc/scrule/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1032720 - 2025-10-30
whether to investigate and to prosecute de minimis violations. Discretion permits the office
/sc/scrule/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1032720 - 2025-10-30