Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2431 - 2440 of 45120 for Cost-effective.
Search results 2431 - 2440 of 45120 for Cost-effective.
Frank Balistreri v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
engaged in misconduct.” The LIRC appeals. Balistreri has moved for costs for a frivolous appeal under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8343 - 2005-03-31
engaged in misconduct.” The LIRC appeals. Balistreri has moved for costs for a frivolous appeal under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8343 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Frank Balistreri v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
moved for costs for a frivolous appeal under § 809.25(3), STATS.1 On appeal, this court reviews
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8343 - 2017-09-19
moved for costs for a frivolous appeal under § 809.25(3), STATS.1 On appeal, this court reviews
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8343 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Gordon D. Nelson v. Haus, Roman & Banks, LLP
awarding attorneys fees and costs against Porter personally as a sanction for filing a frivolous action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26535 - 2017-09-21
awarding attorneys fees and costs against Porter personally as a sanction for filing a frivolous action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26535 - 2017-09-21
Chrysler Financial Company, LLC v. Suzanne M. Falter
, but granted her motion for costs of $50. Subsequently, the court also denied Falter’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4378 - 2005-03-31
, but granted her motion for costs of $50. Subsequently, the court also denied Falter’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4378 - 2005-03-31
Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Judith A. Pinchar
days, effective December 19, 2000. ¶21 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Judith A. Pinchar comply
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16390 - 2005-03-31
days, effective December 19, 2000. ¶21 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Judith A. Pinchar comply
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16390 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Frontsheet
discipline. We impose the full costs in this matter, which total $1,310.32 No. 2017AP1887-D
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214486 - 2018-06-19
discipline. We impose the full costs in this matter, which total $1,310.32 No. 2017AP1887-D
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214486 - 2018-06-19
[PDF]
Supreme Court Rule petition 12-09 - supporting memo
, the clerk's office, and the commissioners could enhance operations in an efficient and cost effective manner
/supreme/docs/1209petitionsupport.pdf - 2012-09-10
, the clerk's office, and the commissioners could enhance operations in an efficient and cost effective manner
/supreme/docs/1209petitionsupport.pdf - 2012-09-10
[PDF]
Frontsheet
the full costs of this proceeding, which are $12,022.38 as of December 2, 2014. No. 2012AP818-D
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135152 - 2017-09-21
the full costs of this proceeding, which are $12,022.38 as of December 2, 2014. No. 2012AP818-D
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135152 - 2017-09-21
Frontsheet
that Attorney Gorokhovsky pay the costs of this proceeding. As of April 29, 2013, the Office of Lawyer
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105746 - 2013-12-16
that Attorney Gorokhovsky pay the costs of this proceeding. As of April 29, 2013, the Office of Lawyer
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105746 - 2013-12-16
Frontsheet
costs of this proceeding, which are $12,022.38 as of December 2, 2014. Attorney Hammis asserts
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135152 - 2015-02-16
costs of this proceeding, which are $12,022.38 as of December 2, 2014. Attorney Hammis asserts
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135152 - 2015-02-16