Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2431 - 2440 of 12631 for abuse.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
abuse case. Id., ¶¶2-3. Williams was not the domestic abuse suspect. Id., ¶3. On appeal, we first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118935 - 2014-09-15

Dane County Department of Human Services v. P. P.
for the omission of this argument. Ponn was convicted of felony child abuse on May 10, 2002, pursuant to a plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6876 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
). David Dolecki appeals from a judgment convicting him of two domestic abuse misdemeanors. Attorney
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=619227 - 2023-02-07

Dane County Department of Human Services v. P. P.
for the omission of this argument. Ponn was convicted of felony child abuse on May 10, 2002, pursuant to a plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6872 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. James L.C.
and personal dysfunction, including physical and psychological abuse, neglect, inattention to basic needs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8112 - 2017-09-19

Kathleen M. Donohoe v. Steven J. Klebar
to their father, Steven J. Klebar. She argues that the court “abused its discretion” in determining that: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5025 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
in Robin’s case dated June 17, 2004 (signed July 14, 2004) determining that sexual abuse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50853 - 2014-09-15

Dane County Department of Human Services v. P. P.
for the omission of this argument. Ponn was convicted of felony child abuse on May 10, 2002, pursuant to a plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6877 - 2005-03-31

Susan I. Olson v. Stapleton Corporation
respondents did not identify deponents as experts per a scheduling order requirement; (3) abused its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10186 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Randy J. Netzer
nor filed any motions; “prosecutorial abuse of discretion”; and the court’s failure to ascertain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6108 - 2017-09-19