Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2431 - 2440 of 29817 for des.
Search results 2431 - 2440 of 29817 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
the prosecutor’s conduct breached the terms of the plea agreement is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36585 - 2009-05-26
the prosecutor’s conduct breached the terms of the plea agreement is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36585 - 2009-05-26
[PDF]
State v. Timothy S. Kuklinski
of Review. This court will determine de novo whether undisputed facts show probable cause. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10777 - 2017-09-20
of Review. This court will determine de novo whether undisputed facts show probable cause. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10777 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State Public Defender v. Circuit Court for Fond Du Lac County
. An appellate court is not bound by a trial court's conclusions of law and decides the matter de novo. First
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8249 - 2017-09-19
. An appellate court is not bound by a trial court's conclusions of law and decides the matter de novo. First
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8249 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State Public Defender v. Circuit Court for Fond Du Lac County
. An appellate court is not bound by a trial court's conclusions of law and decides the matter de novo. First
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8248 - 2017-09-19
. An appellate court is not bound by a trial court's conclusions of law and decides the matter de novo. First
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8248 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. “Whether a complaint states a claim for relief is a question of law which this court reviews de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=418350 - 2021-08-31
. “Whether a complaint states a claim for relief is a question of law which this court reviews de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=418350 - 2021-08-31
[PDF]
Ronald J. Rucks v. George Burnett
questions of law de novo. See Monicken, 226 Wis.2d at 125, 593 N.W.2d at 512. A person may be held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15035 - 2017-09-21
questions of law de novo. See Monicken, 226 Wis.2d at 125, 593 N.W.2d at 512. A person may be held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15035 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court for de novo review. After a hearing, the court denied Nigl’s requests and this appeal follows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244248 - 2019-07-30
court for de novo review. After a hearing, the court denied Nigl’s requests and this appeal follows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244248 - 2019-07-30
[PDF]
State v. Christina M. Goerlitz
of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 VERGERONT, J.1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15783 - 2017-09-21
of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 VERGERONT, J.1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15783 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
[of the search].” Miller does not contest the circuit court’s findings of fact. On our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74744 - 2011-12-05
[of the search].” Miller does not contest the circuit court’s findings of fact. On our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74744 - 2011-12-05
Brian Scott Nooyen v. Bonita June Nooyen
for de novo review. ¶4 At the de novo hearing, Brian testified that before he filed his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18097 - 2005-05-09
for de novo review. ¶4 At the de novo hearing, Brian testified that before he filed his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18097 - 2005-05-09