Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2431 - 2440 of 24568 for extending.
Search results 2431 - 2440 of 24568 for extending.
[PDF]
Appeal No. 2006AP974-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2005CF131
that would give reasonable suspicion to extend the duration of the stop beyond the original purpose
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28662 - 2014-09-15
that would give reasonable suspicion to extend the duration of the stop beyond the original purpose
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28662 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
County. He was sentenced to two years’ initial confinement and three years’ extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81587 - 2014-09-15
County. He was sentenced to two years’ initial confinement and three years’ extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81587 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 2013.2 ¶3 T.L.T.’s commitment has been extended on several occasions. As relevant here, Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=367848 - 2021-05-18
, 2013.2 ¶3 T.L.T.’s commitment has been extended on several occasions. As relevant here, Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=367848 - 2021-05-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to suppress evidence. He specifically asserts the arresting officer (1) unlawfully extended the stop when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=832315 - 2024-07-31
to suppress evidence. He specifically asserts the arresting officer (1) unlawfully extended the stop when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=832315 - 2024-07-31
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Debra J.A.
on May 17, 1999. She contends that the trial court did not comply with the provisions for extending time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2189 - 2005-03-31
on May 17, 1999. She contends that the trial court did not comply with the provisions for extending time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2189 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
granted R.A.’s motion to extend the time for filing a response to counsel’s no-merit report. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236530 - 2019-03-01
granted R.A.’s motion to extend the time for filing a response to counsel’s no-merit report. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236530 - 2019-03-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to concurrent terms of three years of initial confinement and four years of extended supervision on each
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160869 - 2017-09-21
to concurrent terms of three years of initial confinement and four years of extended supervision on each
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160869 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. He was sentenced to four years of initial confinement and four years of extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194371 - 2017-09-21
. He was sentenced to four years of initial confinement and four years of extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194371 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
sentenced him to ten years of initial confinement and fifteen years of extended supervision, and, among
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100621 - 2017-09-21
sentenced him to ten years of initial confinement and fifteen years of extended supervision, and, among
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100621 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 19, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
counts, for a total of sixteen years of confinement and ten years of extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27436 - 2006-12-18
counts, for a total of sixteen years of confinement and ten years of extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27436 - 2006-12-18