Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2431 - 2440 of 20930 for word.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
not embrace a formalistic application of those requirements. Id. Nor do we require “magic words
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173636 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
., ¶43. In other words, the circuit court must believe that the proffered reason actually exists. Id
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162152 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Town of East Troy v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company
., Inc., 166 Wis.2d 105, 115, 479 N.W.2d 557, 562 (Ct. App. 1991). However, when words or phrases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11351 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court’s explanation that the word “in” was a typographical error for the word
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88245 - 2012-10-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
With the exception of Class A felonies, felony sentences in Wisconsin are bifurcated; in other words, they are made
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1039687 - 2025-11-18

COURT OF APPEALS
the defendant’s acts, under the circumstances. Mey focuses on this definition of “unequivocally.” That word
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37749 - 2009-07-15

State v. Richard W. Foelker
or the police who suggested what was to be said to the suspect; in other words, was the citizen, in essence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10528 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
was not a “magic words” requirement or a trap for circuit courts. See Gallion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28217 - 2014-09-15

97-05 Amendment of SCR 20:1.15
, which. The trust account shall be clearly designated as “Client’s Account” or “Trust Account” or words
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1201 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 27, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
expressly stated that its test was not a “magic words” requirement or a trap for circuit courts. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28217 - 2007-02-26