Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24301 - 24310 of 30247 for de.

[PDF] State v. Deborah E.
the proper legal standard governing termination of parental rights presents a question of law subject to de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4681 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. David J. Cleveland
a violation exists in a given case is a question of constitutional law which we review de novo.” Id. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16108 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the applicable legal standards is a question of law we review de novo. Therese B., 267 Wis. 2d 310, ¶21. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220266 - 2018-10-03

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
satisfy the statutory standards, however, is a question of law that is reviewed de novo. Marathon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=739052 - 2023-12-13

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of a statute and case law raises questions of law that we review de novo.” State v. Starks, 2013 WI 69, ¶28
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249147 - 2019-10-28

[PDF] State v. Timothy T. Clark
we review de novo.” Id. (citing State v. Guzman, 166 Wis. 2d 577, 586, 480 N.W.2d 446 (1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5570 - 2017-09-19

State v. Darcy Stafford
that performance prejudiced the defense, are questions of law which we review de novo. State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11541 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
364. We review an agency’s conclusions of law de novo, Tetra Tech EC, Inc. v. DOR, 2018 WI 75, ¶84
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=449324 - 2021-11-04

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of a postconviction motion seeking an evidentiary hearing is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231200 - 2018-12-26

[PDF] Erik Jensen v. David D. McPherson, M.D.
involves the interpretation of a statute, a question of law which we review de novo. See Agnes T. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4533 - 2017-09-19