Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24301 - 24310 of 58542 for speedy trial.
Search results 24301 - 24310 of 58542 for speedy trial.
State v. Daniel C. Clussman
trial counsel was ineffective for failing to request and secure a jury instruction regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13554 - 2005-03-31
trial counsel was ineffective for failing to request and secure a jury instruction regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13554 - 2005-03-31
State v. Richard L. Drager
and further asserts the trial court applied an incorrect standard of probable cause and the State failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25310 - 2006-05-30
and further asserts the trial court applied an incorrect standard of probable cause and the State failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25310 - 2006-05-30
COURT OF APPEALS
. Similarly, McDowell’s claim that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to call the sentencing court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35053 - 2008-12-29
. Similarly, McDowell’s claim that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to call the sentencing court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35053 - 2008-12-29
COURT OF APPEALS
the trial court has applied the correct legal standard is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33343 - 2008-07-09
the trial court has applied the correct legal standard is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33343 - 2008-07-09
COURT OF APPEALS
was denied his right to trial by an impartial jury and his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to move
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129364 - 2014-11-19
was denied his right to trial by an impartial jury and his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to move
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129364 - 2014-11-19
[PDF]
State v. Bashar Elramahi
and correctly exercised its discretion. Sentencing is within the sound discretion of the trial court and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14239 - 2014-09-15
and correctly exercised its discretion. Sentencing is within the sound discretion of the trial court and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14239 - 2014-09-15
State v. Manuel L. Riley
that an illegal search occurred and that inadmissible hearsay was introduced at trial. We reject his claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12797 - 2005-03-31
that an illegal search occurred and that inadmissible hearsay was introduced at trial. We reject his claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12797 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mason S.
, 690-92, 294 N.W.2d 675, 677-78 (1980). In this case, following a bench trial, the juvenile court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15236 - 2005-03-31
, 690-92, 294 N.W.2d 675, 677-78 (1980). In this case, following a bench trial, the juvenile court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15236 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Matthew A. Bennett
facility and asks that we “direct the trial court to amend its judgment of conviction to order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15328 - 2017-09-21
facility and asks that we “direct the trial court to amend its judgment of conviction to order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15328 - 2017-09-21
State v. Bashar Elramahi
its discretion. Sentencing is within the sound discretion of the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14239 - 2005-03-31
its discretion. Sentencing is within the sound discretion of the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14239 - 2005-03-31