Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24311 - 24320 of 29817 for des.
Search results 24311 - 24320 of 29817 for des.
State v. Kevin L. McCullough
of law, which we review de novo based on the facts as found by the circuit court. Morgan, 254 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19807 - 2005-10-03
of law, which we review de novo based on the facts as found by the circuit court. Morgan, 254 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19807 - 2005-10-03
State v. Robert J. Defliger
in evaluating the sufficiency of a criminal complaint or information, which is a question of law we decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4277 - 2005-03-31
in evaluating the sufficiency of a criminal complaint or information, which is a question of law we decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4277 - 2005-03-31
Association of State Prosecutors v. Milwaukee County and the
. This determination involves a question of law that we review de novo. In Interest of J.A.L., 162 Wis. 2d 940, 962
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16887 - 2005-03-31
. This determination involves a question of law that we review de novo. In Interest of J.A.L., 162 Wis. 2d 940, 962
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16887 - 2005-03-31
State v. Roger H. Leiskau
denied the motion. Although we review the record de novo for purposes of deciding whether to grant a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8522 - 2005-03-31
denied the motion. Although we review the record de novo for purposes of deciding whether to grant a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8522 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Wis. 2d 246, 758 N.W.2d 196. “We review such an award de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120155 - 2014-08-25
Wis. 2d 246, 758 N.W.2d 196. “We review such an award de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120155 - 2014-08-25
COURT OF APPEALS
, including his failure to proofread.[8] ¶14 Roma II incorrectly maintains our standard of review is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36075 - 2009-04-07
, including his failure to proofread.[8] ¶14 Roma II incorrectly maintains our standard of review is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36075 - 2009-04-07
WI App 34 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP1163-CR Complete T...
§ 973.015. This presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See Village of Shorewood v. Steinberg
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107668 - 2014-03-25
§ 973.015. This presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See Village of Shorewood v. Steinberg
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107668 - 2014-03-25
State v. Robert Carnemolla
, 295 (1993). We review the circuit court’s harmless-error conclusion de novo, State v. Keith, 216 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14622 - 2005-03-31
, 295 (1993). We review the circuit court’s harmless-error conclusion de novo, State v. Keith, 216 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14622 - 2005-03-31
State v. Maurice E. O'Neal
a question of constitutional fact which we review de novo. See Williams, 255 Wis. 2d 1, ¶17. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7095 - 2005-03-31
a question of constitutional fact which we review de novo. See Williams, 255 Wis. 2d 1, ¶17. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7095 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Iran D. Evans
instruction presents a question of law which we review de novo. “The submission of a lesser-included
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5465 - 2017-09-19
instruction presents a question of law which we review de novo. “The submission of a lesser-included
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5465 - 2017-09-19