Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24321 - 24330 of 29817 for des.
Search results 24321 - 24330 of 29817 for des.
[PDF]
NOTICE
is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Armstrong, 223 Wis. 2d 331, 345, 352-353, 588 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30948 - 2014-09-15
is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Armstrong, 223 Wis. 2d 331, 345, 352-353, 588 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30948 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Brandon J. Matke
, a question we also decide de novo. State v. Navarro, 2001 WI App 225, ¶6, 248 Wis. 2d 396, 636 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6804 - 2017-09-20
, a question we also decide de novo. State v. Navarro, 2001 WI App 225, ¶6, 248 Wis. 2d 396, 636 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6804 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Marshall E. Begel v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission
deference, due weight deference or de novo review, depending on the circumstances. UFE, Inc. v. LIRC, 201
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2799 - 2017-09-19
deference, due weight deference or de novo review, depending on the circumstances. UFE, Inc. v. LIRC, 201
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2799 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Midwest Energy Resources Co. v. Wisconsin Department of Administration
determined. Interpretation of the administrative code presents us with a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20540 - 2017-09-21
determined. Interpretation of the administrative code presents us with a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20540 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Raymond D. Wilson
burden of proof. This presents a question of law and we will review it de novo. “An appellate court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11764 - 2017-09-20
burden of proof. This presents a question of law and we will review it de novo. “An appellate court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11764 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for ineffective assistance is “a question of law that this court decides de novo.” State v. Domke, 2011 WI 95
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=792608 - 2024-04-24
for ineffective assistance is “a question of law that this court decides de novo.” State v. Domke, 2011 WI 95
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=792608 - 2024-04-24
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Alan D. Eisenberg
erroneous but conclusions of law are reviewed on a de novo basis. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16591 - 2017-09-21
erroneous but conclusions of law are reviewed on a de novo basis. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16591 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(1985). The question is one of law for our de novo review. See State v. Harrell, 2008 WI App 37, ¶37
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97330 - 2014-09-15
(1985). The question is one of law for our de novo review. See State v. Harrell, 2008 WI App 37, ¶37
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97330 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Mark A. Flagstadt
. Despite our de novo standard of review, we hasten to add that we value a trial court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5585 - 2017-09-19
. Despite our de novo standard of review, we hasten to add that we value a trial court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5585 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Frontsheet
Interpreting and applying Wis. Stat. § 973.046 presents a question of law, which we review de novo. CED
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214321 - 2018-06-15
Interpreting and applying Wis. Stat. § 973.046 presents a question of law, which we review de novo. CED
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214321 - 2018-06-15