Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24321 - 24330 of 58970 for quit claim deed.
Search results 24321 - 24330 of 58970 for quit claim deed.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for its witness’s testimony estimating the number of his victims. Finally, Caley claims that there were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=357936 - 2021-04-20
for its witness’s testimony estimating the number of his victims. Finally, Caley claims that there were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=357936 - 2021-04-20
[PDF]
State v. Christopher M. Antonicci
postconviction motion. This appeal follows. No. 04-0292-CR 4 DISCUSSION ¶9 Statutory Claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7277 - 2017-09-20
postconviction motion. This appeal follows. No. 04-0292-CR 4 DISCUSSION ¶9 Statutory Claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7277 - 2017-09-20
William F. Kelsey v. Jens Otto Luebow
stipulation. Alternatively, he moved for “relief from the … stipulation,” claiming that it contained terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11864 - 2005-03-31
stipulation. Alternatively, he moved for “relief from the … stipulation,” claiming that it contained terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11864 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that the State violated his right to be free from double jeopardy. This claim arises from the State’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94010 - 2013-03-12
that the State violated his right to be free from double jeopardy. This claim arises from the State’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94010 - 2013-03-12
[PDF]
Jeffrey Opichka v. Racine County
a valid accord and satisfaction with two of the plaintiffs, so as to preclude their claims. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24711 - 2017-09-21
a valid accord and satisfaction with two of the plaintiffs, so as to preclude their claims. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24711 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jack R. Hayes
assistance of counsel claim in context, we recount the facts from Hayes’s testimony. Zieve denied that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4784 - 2017-09-19
assistance of counsel claim in context, we recount the facts from Hayes’s testimony. Zieve denied that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4784 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
claim must therefore fail. We affirm. Background ¶2 Aamaans owned real property in Rock County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=230949 - 2018-12-26
claim must therefore fail. We affirm. Background ¶2 Aamaans owned real property in Rock County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=230949 - 2018-12-26
[PDF]
State v. Dennis L. Steele
filed a motion for a new trial claiming that he was denied effective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13267 - 2017-09-21
filed a motion for a new trial claiming that he was denied effective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13267 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. told him Oliver said “Die, motherfucker” before the shooting. Second, Oliver claimed trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=202422 - 2017-11-14
. told him Oliver said “Die, motherfucker” before the shooting. Second, Oliver claimed trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=202422 - 2017-11-14
[PDF]
State v. James B.
their parental rights have no special claim to the children in the best- interests phase. Richard D. v. Rebecca
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6191 - 2017-09-19
their parental rights have no special claim to the children in the best- interests phase. Richard D. v. Rebecca
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6191 - 2017-09-19