Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24331 - 24340 of 29823 for des.
Search results 24331 - 24340 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
State v. Keith Schroeder
. § 971.23(1)(e) is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Deborah J.Z., 228 Wis. 2d 468, 472
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15529 - 2017-09-21
. § 971.23(1)(e) is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Deborah J.Z., 228 Wis. 2d 468, 472
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15529 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Norman C. Danielson v. City of Sun Prairie
to undisputed facts, which we decide de novo. See Cemetery Servs., Inc. v. Department of Regulation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16121 - 2017-09-21
to undisputed facts, which we decide de novo. See Cemetery Servs., Inc. v. Department of Regulation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16121 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Kevin Spinks
instruction is a question of law which we decide de novo. State v. Borrell, 167 Wis.2d 749, 779, 482 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11997 - 2017-09-21
instruction is a question of law which we decide de novo. State v. Borrell, 167 Wis.2d 749, 779, 482 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11997 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Justice C. Granger
violated is a constitutional fact that we determine de novo. See State v. Ross, 203 Wis.2d 66, 79, 552
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13476 - 2017-09-21
violated is a constitutional fact that we determine de novo. See State v. Ross, 203 Wis.2d 66, 79, 552
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13476 - 2017-09-21
Elwyn O. Jarvis v. James F. Gonring
that the argument is attenuated, we deem the matter de minimis and decline to consider it further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7712 - 2005-03-31
that the argument is attenuated, we deem the matter de minimis and decline to consider it further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7712 - 2005-03-31
WI App 130 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP133 Complete Title of...
and apply it to undisputed facts. This is a question of law that we review de novo. Andersen v. DNR, 2011
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88647 - 2012-11-28
and apply it to undisputed facts. This is a question of law that we review de novo. Andersen v. DNR, 2011
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88647 - 2012-11-28
WI App 56 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP1753-CR 2013AP1754-CR ...
on this statutory-interpretation appeal is de novo. See Village of Shorewood v. Steinberg, 174 Wis. 2d 191, 201
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111193 - 2014-05-27
on this statutory-interpretation appeal is de novo. See Village of Shorewood v. Steinberg, 174 Wis. 2d 191, 201
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111193 - 2014-05-27
COURT OF APPEALS
, including his failure to proofread.[8] ¶14 Roma II incorrectly maintains our standard of review is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36075 - 2009-04-07
, including his failure to proofread.[8] ¶14 Roma II incorrectly maintains our standard of review is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36075 - 2009-04-07
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment de novo, applying the same standards and methodology as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31288 - 2007-12-26
judgment de novo, applying the same standards and methodology as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31288 - 2007-12-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
; whether counsel’s conduct constitutes ineffective assistance is a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001470 - 2025-08-26
; whether counsel’s conduct constitutes ineffective assistance is a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001470 - 2025-08-26