Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24331 - 24340 of 29823 for des.

[PDF] WI APP 42
of law, which we review de novo. See Landwehr v. Landwehr, 2006 WI 64, ¶8, 291 Wis. 2d 49, 715 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35927 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
, is sufficient to submit punitive damages to the jury presents a question of law which we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60433 - 2011-03-01

COURT OF APPEALS
the constitutional protection against double jeopardy is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32170 - 2008-03-19

COURT OF APPEALS
for purposes of resolution under the Act presents a question of law subject to de novo review. Olson, 309 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113177 - 2014-05-28

Northern States Power Company v. National Gas Company, Inc.
., 183 Wis.2d 627, 654, 517 N.W.2d 432, 443 (1994). We review questions of law de novo, while benefiting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15609 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
of law that we review de novo.[5] Wausau Tile, Inc. v. County Concrete Corp., 226 Wis. 2d 235, 245, 593
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53103 - 2010-08-09

State v. T.J. International, Inc.
review de novo. State v. Sostre, 198 Wis. 2d 409, 414, 542 N.W.2d 774 (1996). Statutory interpretation
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17559 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 27
will review de novo and that a reasonable jurist may reach a different conclusion [on],” and noted that “[s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=925672 - 2025-05-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is applicable. WIS. STAT. § 48.415(1)(c). B. Summary Judgment ¶6 This court reviews summary judgment de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226667 - 2018-11-08

COURT OF APPEALS
, we are confined to the summary judgment record, and we review summary judgments de novo, using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32390 - 2008-04-07