Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24341 - 24350 of 30001 for de.
Search results 24341 - 24350 of 30001 for de.
Cassandra Sherrill Patterson v. Lynns Waste Paper Co.
treatment of this woman in light of Dr. Dahl’s opinion as to the de minimus nature of her injuries and Dr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10134 - 2005-03-31
treatment of this woman in light of Dr. Dahl’s opinion as to the de minimus nature of her injuries and Dr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10134 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Clarence Givens
, not a factual one,’” which we review de novo. United States v. Davis, 15 F.3d 1393, 1415 (7th Cir. 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12420 - 2017-09-21
, not a factual one,’” which we review de novo. United States v. Davis, 15 F.3d 1393, 1415 (7th Cir. 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12420 - 2017-09-21
State v. Calvin Pluim
of the magistrate’s probable cause determination is not de novo, even though it presents a question of law; rather, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15225 - 2005-03-31
of the magistrate’s probable cause determination is not de novo, even though it presents a question of law; rather, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15225 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“acted according to law.” ¶8 Because our review of the Common Council’s decision is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70007 - 2014-09-15
“acted according to law.” ¶8 Because our review of the Common Council’s decision is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70007 - 2014-09-15
John W. Kneubuhler II v. Labor & industry Review Commission
.2d 57, 62 (1996) (de novo review, with no deference to agency, is appropriate when issue is one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12723 - 2005-03-31
.2d 57, 62 (1996) (de novo review, with no deference to agency, is appropriate when issue is one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12723 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, subject to our de novo review.” Smith, 342 Wis. 2d 710, ¶24. When conducting our review, “we consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=958882 - 2025-05-20
, subject to our de novo review.” Smith, 342 Wis. 2d 710, ¶24. When conducting our review, “we consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=958882 - 2025-05-20
COURT OF APPEALS
, Lakeland Leisure, and State Farm Auto. We review de novo the grant or denial of summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69330 - 2011-08-08
, Lakeland Leisure, and State Farm Auto. We review de novo the grant or denial of summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69330 - 2011-08-08
[PDF]
State v. Robert Carnemolla
de novo, State v. Keith, 216 Wis.2d 61, 69, 573 Wis.2d 888, 892-93 (Ct. App. 1997), and the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14622 - 2017-09-21
de novo, State v. Keith, 216 Wis.2d 61, 69, 573 Wis.2d 888, 892-93 (Ct. App. 1997), and the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14622 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI App 72
is a question of law we review de novo. Strassman, 225 Wis. 2d at 788. When interpreting a statute, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36214 - 2014-09-15
is a question of law we review de novo. Strassman, 225 Wis. 2d at 788. When interpreting a statute, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36214 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for effective assistance is a legal question reviewed de novo. Id. ¶14 Johnnie’s ineffective-assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120102 - 2014-09-15
for effective assistance is a legal question reviewed de novo. Id. ¶14 Johnnie’s ineffective-assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120102 - 2014-09-15