Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24341 - 24350 of 29823 for des.
Search results 24341 - 24350 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, subject to our de novo review.” Smith, 342 Wis. 2d 710, ¶24. When conducting our review, “we consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=958882 - 2025-05-20
, subject to our de novo review.” Smith, 342 Wis. 2d 710, ¶24. When conducting our review, “we consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=958882 - 2025-05-20
Miguel A. Rivera v. Beth T. Vandeboom
, 109-10, 85 N.W.2d 852 (1957), Simon v. Van de Hey, 269 Wis. 50, 55, 68 N.W.2d 529 (1955), and Anderson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3065 - 2005-03-31
, 109-10, 85 N.W.2d 852 (1957), Simon v. Van de Hey, 269 Wis. 50, 55, 68 N.W.2d 529 (1955), and Anderson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3065 - 2005-03-31
TFJ Nominee Trust v. State of Wisconsin Department of Transportation
Resolution of this appeal requires interpretation of Wis. Stat. § 32.05, a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2877 - 2005-03-31
Resolution of this appeal requires interpretation of Wis. Stat. § 32.05, a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2877 - 2005-03-31
James A. Rehrauer v. City of Milwaukee
we are assisted by the circuit court’s analysis, Welter, 214 Wis. 2d at 489, our review is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2875 - 2005-03-31
we are assisted by the circuit court’s analysis, Welter, 214 Wis. 2d at 489, our review is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2875 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
are not in dispute on this issue. “Custody” therefore is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30376 - 2007-09-25
are not in dispute on this issue. “Custody” therefore is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30376 - 2007-09-25
State v. Calvin Pluim
of the magistrate’s probable cause determination is not de novo, even though it presents a question of law; rather, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15225 - 2005-03-31
of the magistrate’s probable cause determination is not de novo, even though it presents a question of law; rather, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15225 - 2005-03-31
State v. Maurice E. O'Neal
a question of constitutional fact which we review de novo. See Williams, 255 Wis. 2d 1, ¶17. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7095 - 2005-03-31
a question of constitutional fact which we review de novo. See Williams, 255 Wis. 2d 1, ¶17. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7095 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Benjamin J. Barney
the plea agreement was before or after “sentencing.” This is a question of law which we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11682 - 2017-09-19
the plea agreement was before or after “sentencing.” This is a question of law which we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11682 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Darcy Stafford
that performance prejudiced the defense, are questions of law which we review de novo. State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11541 - 2017-09-19
that performance prejudiced the defense, are questions of law which we review de novo. State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11541 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Alan D. Eisenberg
erroneous but conclusions of law are reviewed on a de novo basis. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16591 - 2017-09-21
erroneous but conclusions of law are reviewed on a de novo basis. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16591 - 2017-09-21