Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24351 - 24360 of 44408 for name change.

[PDF] State v. Melvin D. Toran
. 2 We note that a change in parole policy does not constitute a “new factor” for sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20512 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
sorry you’re in this spot at your age, Ms. Andersen, but you never wanted to change what is very
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=198727 - 2017-10-24

[PDF] Jody Muschinske v. Jeffrey Muschinske
the circumstances had not changed since the 1977 divorce. We decline to review these issues because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13490 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
changes from original omitted)). Based on the standard, we conclude that the County demonstrated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166467 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Brakebush Brothers, Inc. v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
that the information on Engel's activities would cause him to change his conclusions. As a result, in the absence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9689 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
filed a motion to change his plea from guilty to no contest. As grounds for the motion, Hatfield
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=511951 - 2022-04-19

[PDF] NOTICE
construed, Seibert provides us with no authority showing that this rule also changes the requirements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29513 - 2014-09-15

Jackson County v. State of Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
in reasonable reliance on the deed, and that a “mere change in title” is not sufficient to invoke the vested
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19930 - 2005-10-12

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 21, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
] Alexander also alleged that changes in the law resulting from Truth-in-Sentencing II (effective February 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28150 - 2007-02-20

State v. Jamal R. Jackson
” remark does not change our analysis. Taken in context, the remark does not indicate a “preconceived
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12772 - 2005-03-31