Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24371 - 24380 of 64743 for b's.
Search results 24371 - 24380 of 64743 for b's.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with 1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(b) (2021-22). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=638845 - 2023-03-29
with 1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(b) (2021-22). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=638845 - 2023-03-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
,” but it is not ambiguous if that is not the case. See id. B. Analysis ¶13 The Department argues that the terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=502059 - 2022-03-31
,” but it is not ambiguous if that is not the case. See id. B. Analysis ¶13 The Department argues that the terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=502059 - 2022-03-31
[PDF]
City of Middleton v. Daniel L. Barrett
that 2 Section 346.63(1)(b), STATS., provides: The person has a prohibited alcohol concentration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10324 - 2017-09-20
that 2 Section 346.63(1)(b), STATS., provides: The person has a prohibited alcohol concentration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10324 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-CR 2 contrary to WIS. STAT. §§ 940.01(1)(a) & 939.63(1)(b) (2011-12). 1 He also appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110320 - 2017-09-21
-CR 2 contrary to WIS. STAT. §§ 940.01(1)(a) & 939.63(1)(b) (2011-12). 1 He also appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110320 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the Bangert line of cases. B. Plea Withdrawal Based on the Ineffective Assistance of Trial Counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116805 - 2017-09-21
the Bangert line of cases. B. Plea Withdrawal Based on the Ineffective Assistance of Trial Counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116805 - 2017-09-21
Frontsheet
:1.4(b).[7] ¶21 The referee discussed the terms of the stipulation. He also discussed Attorney Boyd's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50466 - 2010-05-26
:1.4(b).[7] ¶21 The referee discussed the terms of the stipulation. He also discussed Attorney Boyd's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50466 - 2010-05-26
R. Scott McCormick v. Richard A. Schubring
. For the plaintiffs-respondents there was a brief (in the court of appeals) by John B. Rhode and Sommer, Olk
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16617 - 2005-03-31
. For the plaintiffs-respondents there was a brief (in the court of appeals) by John B. Rhode and Sommer, Olk
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16617 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Darla J. Tilley
. …. (b) The officer’s or other person’s belief shall be based on any of the following: 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3045 - 2017-09-19
. …. (b) The officer’s or other person’s belief shall be based on any of the following: 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3045 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
to a challenge to the plea’s validity under the Bangert line of cases. B. Plea Withdrawal Based
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116805 - 2014-07-08
to a challenge to the plea’s validity under the Bangert line of cases. B. Plea Withdrawal Based
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116805 - 2014-07-08
Michael S.E. v. Shawn B.S.
., Appellant, v. Shawn B. S., Respondent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5760 - 2005-03-31
., Appellant, v. Shawn B. S., Respondent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5760 - 2005-03-31