Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24371 - 24380 of 29713 for des.
Search results 24371 - 24380 of 29713 for des.
Gary J. Howell v. Orrin Denomie
argument for an extension, modification or reversal of existing law. ¶14 Our de novo evaluation
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18666 - 2005-06-21
argument for an extension, modification or reversal of existing law. ¶14 Our de novo evaluation
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18666 - 2005-06-21
[PDF]
State v. Raymond D. Wilson
burden of proof. This presents a question of law and we will review it de novo. “An appellate court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11764 - 2017-09-20
burden of proof. This presents a question of law and we will review it de novo. “An appellate court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11764 - 2017-09-20
Marshall E. Begel v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission
deference or de novo review, depending on the circumstances. UFE, Inc. v. LIRC, 201 Wis. 2d 274, 284, 548
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2799 - 2005-03-31
deference or de novo review, depending on the circumstances. UFE, Inc. v. LIRC, 201 Wis. 2d 274, 284, 548
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2799 - 2005-03-31
Liturgical Publications, Inc. v. Steven P. Karides
summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the trial court. Modern Materials, Inc. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24770 - 2006-04-11
summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the trial court. Modern Materials, Inc. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24770 - 2006-04-11
Frontsheet
they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32713 - 2008-05-15
they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32713 - 2008-05-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of law, which we review de novo.” Id. (italics added). ¶29 In this case, the trial court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125308 - 2014-10-27
of law, which we review de novo.” Id. (italics added). ¶29 In this case, the trial court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125308 - 2014-10-27
Craig I. Halverson v. June E. Halverson
is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. Hokin, 231 Wis. 2d at 191 ¶9. ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2801 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. Hokin, 231 Wis. 2d at 191 ¶9. ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2801 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
compensation statutes to those facts,” which is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶18 As noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1045151 - 2025-12-02
compensation statutes to those facts,” which is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶18 As noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1045151 - 2025-12-02
WI App 133 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP2372-CR Complete Titl...
we review de novo. Id., ¶5. ¶11 A statute may be challenged on its face as overbroad even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89025 - 2013-11-17
we review de novo. Id., ¶5. ¶11 A statute may be challenged on its face as overbroad even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89025 - 2013-11-17
[PDF]
State v. Mark A. Flagstadt
. Despite our de novo standard of review, we hasten to add that we value a trial court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5585 - 2017-09-19
. Despite our de novo standard of review, we hasten to add that we value a trial court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5585 - 2017-09-19