Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24371 - 24380 of 29823 for des.
Search results 24371 - 24380 of 29823 for des.
Gary J. Howell v. Orrin Denomie
argument for an extension, modification or reversal of existing law. ¶14 Our de novo evaluation
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18666 - 2005-06-21
argument for an extension, modification or reversal of existing law. ¶14 Our de novo evaluation
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18666 - 2005-06-21
State v. Leandro Arechederra III
to a defendant is fundamental or technical is a question of statutory interpretation which this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3681 - 2005-03-31
to a defendant is fundamental or technical is a question of statutory interpretation which this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3681 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
). Although we ordinarily review questions of law de novo, we afford some deference to the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71237 - 2011-09-21
). Although we ordinarily review questions of law de novo, we afford some deference to the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71237 - 2011-09-21
2007 WI App 171
is substantial is a question of law which we review de novo. Dahlke v. Dahlke, 2002 WI App 282, ¶8, 258 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29379 - 2007-07-24
is substantial is a question of law which we review de novo. Dahlke v. Dahlke, 2002 WI App 282, ¶8, 258 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29379 - 2007-07-24
[PDF]
State v. Charles Edward Hennings
decisions and was clearly not deficient. ¶27 On our de novo review, we agree with the postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19667 - 2017-09-21
decisions and was clearly not deficient. ¶27 On our de novo review, we agree with the postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19667 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
William N. Ledford v. Circuit Court for Dane County
in § 893.82, STATS., qualify as an administrative remedy presents a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15358 - 2017-09-21
in § 893.82, STATS., qualify as an administrative remedy presents a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15358 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
568, 682 N.W.2d 433. We review the sufficiency of a postconviction motion de novo, based on the four
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30340 - 2007-09-19
568, 682 N.W.2d 433. We review the sufficiency of a postconviction motion de novo, based on the four
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30340 - 2007-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Scott Heimermann
determination of whether counsel's performance was deficient and prejudicial” de novo. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8548 - 2017-09-19
determination of whether counsel's performance was deficient and prejudicial” de novo. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8548 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Trisha M. Waupoose
the facts as found by the trial court pass constitutional muster is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16249 - 2017-09-21
the facts as found by the trial court pass constitutional muster is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16249 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the rule of reason are questions of law, which we review de novo, although we No. 2012AP1942 6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110424 - 2017-09-21
of the rule of reason are questions of law, which we review de novo, although we No. 2012AP1942 6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110424 - 2017-09-21