Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24371 - 24380 of 29823 for des.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and the circuit court reviewed that decision de novo. Additionally, the circuit court considered a motion filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147243 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] TFJ Nominee Trust v. State of Wisconsin Department of Transportation
, a question of law we review de novo. See Miesen v. DOT, 226 Wis. 2d 298, 304, 594 N.W.2d 821 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2877 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
theories.”[2] See Sliwinski, 289 Wis. 2d 422, ¶12. These are questions of law that we review de novo, id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50842 - 2010-06-14

COURT OF APPEALS
his child would very likely experience by visiting him in prison.” Schroeder requested de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68993 - 2011-08-08

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
are properly joined is a question of law that we review de novo. See id., ¶30. ¶10 Pursuant to WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=417693 - 2021-08-31

[PDF] State v. Deborah J.Z.
—is an issue of statutory construction. Statutory construction is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11496 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. Id. “A defendant who requests resentencing due to the circuit court’s use of inaccurate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33656 - 2008-08-05

Heritage Bank & Trust v. Duane Dietsche
an interpretation of the law of civil procedure. We review that issue de novo. See State v. Turner, 136 Wis.2d 333
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11882 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
of these historical facts to constitutional principles, which we review de novo.” Id. ¶20 “[R]easonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88676 - 2012-10-24

Frontsheet
of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105627 - 2013-12-12