Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24381 - 24390 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
Search results 24381 - 24390 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
on that case had expired. ¶3 Relative to appeal No. 2007AP1337-CR, Griffin was convicted in October 2004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33274 - 2008-07-07
on that case had expired. ¶3 Relative to appeal No. 2007AP1337-CR, Griffin was convicted in October 2004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33274 - 2008-07-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this No. 2023AP1858 2 case is appropriate for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=875399 - 2024-11-14
conclude at conference that this No. 2023AP1858 2 case is appropriate for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=875399 - 2024-11-14
CA Blank Order
to observe the driver. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102036 - 2013-09-15
to observe the driver. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102036 - 2013-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
advised him of his right to file a response. Smith has not responded. We conclude that these cases
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156912 - 2017-09-21
advised him of his right to file a response. Smith has not responded. We conclude that these cases
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156912 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of conviction in each of three cases. His appellate counsel filed a no-merit report as to these consolidated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=869354 - 2024-10-30
of conviction in each of three cases. His appellate counsel filed a no-merit report as to these consolidated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=869354 - 2024-10-30
[PDF]
�
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97315 - 2014-09-15
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97315 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Darryl H. Stegall
, ___ Wis.2d ___, 564 N.W.2d 716 (1997).2 I. The procedural facts of this case are rather confusing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10843 - 2017-09-20
, ___ Wis.2d ___, 564 N.W.2d 716 (1997).2 I. The procedural facts of this case are rather confusing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10843 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21.1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=678751 - 2023-07-13
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21.1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=678751 - 2023-07-13
COURT OF APPEALS
” of the case in a document received by the district attorney’s office on June 1, 2012. Under § 971.11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104801 - 2013-11-25
” of the case in a document received by the district attorney’s office on June 1, 2012. Under § 971.11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104801 - 2013-11-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135178 - 2017-09-21
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135178 - 2017-09-21