Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24381 - 24390 of 30072 for de.
Search results 24381 - 24390 of 30072 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS
of a statute are questions of law that we review de novo. The plaintiff bears the burden of establishing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49566 - 2010-05-03
of a statute are questions of law that we review de novo. The plaintiff bears the burden of establishing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49566 - 2010-05-03
COURT OF APPEALS
Ordinarily, statutory interpretation is a question of law that we review de novo. Harnischfeger Corp. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86397 - 2012-08-22
Ordinarily, statutory interpretation is a question of law that we review de novo. Harnischfeger Corp. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86397 - 2012-08-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of facts meets a particular legal standard is a question of law” subject to de novo review. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182229 - 2017-09-21
of facts meets a particular legal standard is a question of law” subject to de novo review. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182229 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
No. 2023AP650-CR 8 de novo. See State v. Vesper, 2018 WI App 31, ¶38, 382 Wis. 2d 207, 912 N.W.2d 418
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1047911 - 2025-12-09
No. 2023AP650-CR 8 de novo. See State v. Vesper, 2018 WI App 31, ¶38, 382 Wis. 2d 207, 912 N.W.2d 418
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1047911 - 2025-12-09
COURT OF APPEALS
of law that we review de novo.[5] Wausau Tile, Inc. v. County Concrete Corp., 226 Wis. 2d 235, 245, 593
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53103 - 2010-08-09
of law that we review de novo.[5] Wausau Tile, Inc. v. County Concrete Corp., 226 Wis. 2d 235, 245, 593
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53103 - 2010-08-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
process is a question of law that we review de novo.8 See Monroe Cty. DHS v. Kelli B., 2004 WI 48, ¶16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236271 - 2019-03-06
process is a question of law that we review de novo.8 See Monroe Cty. DHS v. Kelli B., 2004 WI 48, ¶16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236271 - 2019-03-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for effective assistance is a legal question reviewed de novo. Id. ¶14 Johnnie’s ineffective-assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120102 - 2014-09-15
for effective assistance is a legal question reviewed de novo. Id. ¶14 Johnnie’s ineffective-assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120102 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 116
review de novo. See State v. Cloud, 133 Wis. 2d 58, 61, 393 N.W.2d 123 (Ct. App. 1986). ¶28
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28507 - 2014-09-15
review de novo. See State v. Cloud, 133 Wis. 2d 58, 61, 393 N.W.2d 123 (Ct. App. 1986). ¶28
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28507 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. Osborn v. Bd. of Regents of Univ. of Wisconsin Sys., 2002 WI 83, ¶12, 254 Wis. 2d 266
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217079 - 2018-08-07
de novo. Osborn v. Bd. of Regents of Univ. of Wisconsin Sys., 2002 WI 83, ¶12, 254 Wis. 2d 266
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217079 - 2018-08-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
whether a court relied on inaccurate information or an improper factor at sentencing de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=844843 - 2024-09-04
whether a court relied on inaccurate information or an improper factor at sentencing de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=844843 - 2024-09-04