Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24381 - 24390 of 29832 for des.
Search results 24381 - 24390 of 29832 for des.
[PDF]
State v. John S. Cooper
review de novo. See State v. Piddington, 2001 WI 24, ¶13, 241 Wis. 2d 754, 623 N.W.2d 528, cert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5587 - 2017-09-19
review de novo. See State v. Piddington, 2001 WI 24, ¶13, 241 Wis. 2d 754, 623 N.W.2d 528, cert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5587 - 2017-09-19
State v. Reginald R. Jones
a question of constitutional fact which we review de novo. See Williams, 255 Wis. 2d 1, ¶17. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7094 - 2005-03-31
a question of constitutional fact which we review de novo. See Williams, 255 Wis. 2d 1, ¶17. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7094 - 2005-03-31
2007 WI APP 2
process and the other on equal protection.[3] Both challenges present questions of law for our de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27522 - 2007-01-30
process and the other on equal protection.[3] Both challenges present questions of law for our de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27522 - 2007-01-30
Katherine A. Goggins v. Rogers Memorial Hospital Incorporated
as the trial court and review the matter de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315, 401 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6408 - 2005-03-31
as the trial court and review the matter de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315, 401 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6408 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of administrative regulations are questions of law that we review de novo. Piper v. Jones Dairy Farm, 2020 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=841115 - 2024-09-10
of administrative regulations are questions of law that we review de novo. Piper v. Jones Dairy Farm, 2020 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=841115 - 2024-09-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
involves contract interpretation, which is a question of law that we review de novo.” First Weber Grp
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=476286 - 2022-01-25
involves contract interpretation, which is a question of law that we review de novo.” First Weber Grp
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=476286 - 2022-01-25
State v. Robert Carnemolla
, 295 (1993). We review the circuit court’s harmless-error conclusion de novo, State v. Keith, 216 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14622 - 2005-03-31
, 295 (1993). We review the circuit court’s harmless-error conclusion de novo, State v. Keith, 216 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14622 - 2005-03-31
Duane Kuester v. Wisconsin Retirement Board
authority in promulgating a rule, we use a de novo standard of review. Id., ¶25. As we do in construing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6034 - 2005-03-31
authority in promulgating a rule, we use a de novo standard of review. Id., ¶25. As we do in construing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6034 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the trial court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, but review de novo whether those facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93377 - 2013-02-27
the trial court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, but review de novo whether those facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93377 - 2013-02-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“acted according to law.” ¶8 Because our review of the Common Council’s decision is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70007 - 2014-09-15
“acted according to law.” ¶8 Because our review of the Common Council’s decision is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70007 - 2014-09-15