Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24381 - 24390 of 29828 for des.
Search results 24381 - 24390 of 29828 for des.
[PDF]
NOTICE
determination of whether counsel’s assistance was ineffective is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58051 - 2014-09-15
determination of whether counsel’s assistance was ineffective is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58051 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a legal issue that we decide de novo, accepting the circuit court’s findings of fact unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=616505 - 2023-01-31
is a legal issue that we decide de novo, accepting the circuit court’s findings of fact unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=616505 - 2023-01-31
[PDF]
WI 54
as de minimis. ¶30 The legislature's choice of language in Wis. Stat. § 70.11(42)(a)2.a. further
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=375405 - 2021-06-08
as de minimis. ¶30 The legislature's choice of language in Wis. Stat. § 70.11(42)(a)2.a. further
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=375405 - 2021-06-08
Katherine A. Goggins v. Rogers Memorial Hospital Incorporated
as the trial court and review the matter de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315, 401 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6408 - 2005-03-31
as the trial court and review the matter de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315, 401 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6408 - 2005-03-31
Randy A. J. v. Norma I. J.
construction of statutes is a question of law that we review de novo. Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis. 2d 361
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4959 - 2005-03-31
construction of statutes is a question of law that we review de novo. Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis. 2d 361
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4959 - 2005-03-31
State v. Victor Naydihor
which we review de novo. State v. Church, 2002 WI App 212, ¶16, __ Wis. 2d __, 650 N.W.2d 873. ¶24
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4609 - 2005-03-31
which we review de novo. State v. Church, 2002 WI App 212, ¶16, __ Wis. 2d __, 650 N.W.2d 873. ¶24
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4609 - 2005-03-31
2010 WI APP 175
this, it seems axiomatic that this is a question of law which we must review de novo. Indeed, Tody points out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56998 - 2010-12-13
this, it seems axiomatic that this is a question of law which we must review de novo. Indeed, Tody points out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56998 - 2010-12-13
[PDF]
Jayna M. Covelli v. Todd M. Covelli
358, 366, 599 N.W.2d 876 (Ct. App. 1999). We review questions of law de novo. Id. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24968 - 2017-09-21
358, 366, 599 N.W.2d 876 (Ct. App. 1999). We review questions of law de novo. Id. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24968 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for effective assistance is a legal question reviewed de novo. Id. ¶14 Johnnie’s ineffective-assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120102 - 2014-09-15
for effective assistance is a legal question reviewed de novo. Id. ¶14 Johnnie’s ineffective-assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120102 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
applicable to the facts of a given case is an issue we review de novo. Id. “An error is prejudicial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87170 - 2014-09-15
applicable to the facts of a given case is an issue we review de novo. Id. “An error is prejudicial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87170 - 2014-09-15