Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2441 - 2450 of 92140 for 1.
Search results 2441 - 2450 of 92140 for 1.
City of Milwaukee v. Shirley A. Negley
claim that the trial court: (1) erred in holding that Mr. Negley was not entitled to a de novo trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11004 - 2005-03-31
claim that the trial court: (1) erred in holding that Mr. Negley was not entitled to a de novo trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11004 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI 33
REVIEW of a decision of the Court of Appeals. Reversed. ¶1 JON P. WILCOX, J. This is a review
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28525 - 2014-09-15
REVIEW of a decision of the Court of Appeals. Reversed. ¶1 JON P. WILCOX, J. This is a review
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28525 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
City of Milwaukee v. Shirley A. Negley
. The Negleys claim that the trial court: (1) erred in holding that Mr. Negley was not entitled to a de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11004 - 2017-09-19
. The Negleys claim that the trial court: (1) erred in holding that Mr. Negley was not entitled to a de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11004 - 2017-09-19
2007 WI APP 173
. ¶1 NETTESHEIM, J. As part of Richard G. Galvan’s bifurcated sentence for homicide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29398 - 2007-07-24
. ¶1 NETTESHEIM, J. As part of Richard G. Galvan’s bifurcated sentence for homicide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29398 - 2007-07-24
City of Milwaukee v. Clifford R. Negley
claim that the trial court: (1) erred in holding that Mr. Negley was not entitled to a de novo trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11005 - 2005-03-31
claim that the trial court: (1) erred in holding that Mr. Negley was not entitled to a de novo trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11005 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
OWI Sentencing Guideline District 3
COMMITTED ON OR AFTER December 1, 2023 THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT 515 W. Moreland Blvd. Waukesha, WI
/publications/fees/docs/d3owi2023.pdf - 2024-01-25
COMMITTED ON OR AFTER December 1, 2023 THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT 515 W. Moreland Blvd. Waukesha, WI
/publications/fees/docs/d3owi2023.pdf - 2024-01-25
[PDF]
WI 31
, Respondent. No. 2023AP1511-D Decided July 1, 2025 ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING ¶1
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977961 - 2025-07-01
, Respondent. No. 2023AP1511-D Decided July 1, 2025 ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING ¶1
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977961 - 2025-07-01
[PDF]
State v. Joel O. Peterson
and Roggensack, JJ. ¶1 VERGERONT, P.J. Joel Peterson challenges the repeater penalty portions of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3496 - 2017-09-19
and Roggensack, JJ. ¶1 VERGERONT, P.J. Joel Peterson challenges the repeater penalty portions of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3496 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Rule petition 20-09a - Supporting Memorandum
1 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN THE SUPREME COURT In re amendment of SUPPORTING
/supreme/docs/2009amemo.pdf - 2022-01-24
1 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN THE SUPREME COURT In re amendment of SUPPORTING
/supreme/docs/2009amemo.pdf - 2022-01-24
Certification
. The question presented is whether Wis. Stat. § 51.20(1)(ar) (2013-14)[1] is facially unconstitutional
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138614 - 2015-03-31
. The question presented is whether Wis. Stat. § 51.20(1)(ar) (2013-14)[1] is facially unconstitutional
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138614 - 2015-03-31