Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2441 - 2450 of 29817 for des.
Search results 2441 - 2450 of 29817 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law we consider de novo. Landwehr v. Landwehr, 2006 WI 64, ¶8, 291 Wis. 2d 49, 715 N.W.2d 180
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39276 - 2009-08-11
is a question of law we consider de novo. Landwehr v. Landwehr, 2006 WI 64, ¶8, 291 Wis. 2d 49, 715 N.W.2d 180
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39276 - 2009-08-11
Helen Schlicht v. Bridget Mary VanDyke
of law which we decide de novo. See Nottelson v. ILHR Dept., 94 Wis. 2d 106, 116, 287 N.W.2d 763 (1980
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6453 - 2005-03-31
of law which we decide de novo. See Nottelson v. ILHR Dept., 94 Wis. 2d 106, 116, 287 N.W.2d 763 (1980
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6453 - 2005-03-31
State v. Clifton M. Wright
or statutory rights were violated is a question of law that we review de novo. See id. at 86, 522 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10817 - 2005-03-31
or statutory rights were violated is a question of law that we review de novo. See id. at 86, 522 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10817 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of such discretion turns upon a question of law, however, we review the question de novo. Id. Here, the issue turns
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108494 - 2014-03-04
of such discretion turns upon a question of law, however, we review the question de novo. Id. Here, the issue turns
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108494 - 2014-03-04
[PDF]
Natalie Baker v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
. The third and lowest level of review provides that we will review the conclusions or interpretation de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11929 - 2017-09-21
. The third and lowest level of review provides that we will review the conclusions or interpretation de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11929 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of counsel’s effectiveness is a question of law that is reviewed de novo by this court. Kimbrough, 246 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211869 - 2018-04-26
of counsel’s effectiveness is a question of law that is reviewed de novo by this court. Kimbrough, 246 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211869 - 2018-04-26
COURT OF APPEALS
violates a statute is a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Murdock, 2000 WI App 170
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115008 - 2014-06-18
violates a statute is a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Murdock, 2000 WI App 170
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115008 - 2014-06-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
are ambiguous, is also a legal question we decide de novo. See id. “Whether a settlement agreement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=460100 - 2021-12-09
are ambiguous, is also a legal question we decide de novo. See id. “Whether a settlement agreement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=460100 - 2021-12-09
COURT OF APPEALS
. Second, based on the historical facts, we review whether a reasonable suspicion justified the stop de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35353 - 2009-01-26
. Second, based on the historical facts, we review whether a reasonable suspicion justified the stop de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35353 - 2009-01-26
Lisa K. Lepak v. Bryan D. Johnvin
is de novo. We apply the standards set forth in § 802.08(2), Stats., in the same manner as the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8656 - 2005-03-31
is de novo. We apply the standards set forth in § 802.08(2), Stats., in the same manner as the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8656 - 2005-03-31