Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24401 - 24410 of 56622 for General Account Probate.
Search results 24401 - 24410 of 56622 for General Account Probate.
COURT OF APPEALS
of probation was a new factor. Id. at 735. The circuit court, nonetheless, determined that Verstoppen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43675 - 2009-11-24
of probation was a new factor. Id. at 735. The circuit court, nonetheless, determined that Verstoppen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43675 - 2009-11-24
State v. Jacques Gibson
was on probation at the time of [the] offense.” We disagree. First, Gibson cites nothing in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14451 - 2005-03-31
was on probation at the time of [the] offense.” We disagree. First, Gibson cites nothing in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14451 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and acquitted him of the battery charges. The court withheld sentence and placed Dillon on probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143653 - 2017-09-21
and acquitted him of the battery charges. The court withheld sentence and placed Dillon on probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143653 - 2017-09-21
State v. Michael G. Kachelski
charge and sentenced Kachelski to twelve months in prison, with concurrent probation. Following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12450 - 2005-03-31
charge and sentenced Kachelski to twelve months in prison, with concurrent probation. Following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12450 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
with the sentence imposed after probation revocation). The no-merit report addresses the following possible
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205110 - 2017-12-12
with the sentence imposed after probation revocation). The no-merit report addresses the following possible
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205110 - 2017-12-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, at Murrell’s probation revocation hearing. There, Davis testified that he had not actually seen Murrell drop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71362 - 2014-09-15
, at Murrell’s probation revocation hearing. There, Davis testified that he had not actually seen Murrell drop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71362 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
confinement was necessary. ¶7 The decision to revoke probation or parole lies within the discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51331 - 2010-06-23
confinement was necessary. ¶7 The decision to revoke probation or parole lies within the discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51331 - 2010-06-23
State v. Jacques Gibson
was on probation at the time of [the] offense.” We disagree. First, Gibson cites nothing in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14341 - 2005-03-31
was on probation at the time of [the] offense.” We disagree. First, Gibson cites nothing in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14341 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Douglas Royster
... for any type of probation or [Division of Intensive Sanctions] sentence, but should instead be sentenced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9122 - 2017-09-19
... for any type of probation or [Division of Intensive Sanctions] sentence, but should instead be sentenced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9122 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in prison. See WIS. STAT. §§ 940.02(2)(a), 939.50(3)(c) (2015-16). It noted that Warrix was on probation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=531414 - 2022-06-15
in prison. See WIS. STAT. §§ 940.02(2)(a), 939.50(3)(c) (2015-16). It noted that Warrix was on probation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=531414 - 2022-06-15