Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24401 - 24410 of 30002 for de.
Search results 24401 - 24410 of 30002 for de.
[PDF]
WI APP 109
of law that we review de novo. See Noffke v. Bakke, 2009 WI 10, ¶9, 315 Wis. 2d 350, 760 N.W.2d 156
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121338 - 2014-11-11
of law that we review de novo. See Noffke v. Bakke, 2009 WI 10, ¶9, 315 Wis. 2d 350, 760 N.W.2d 156
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121338 - 2014-11-11
Jayna M. Covelli v. Todd M. Covelli
. State v. Holmgren, 229 Wis. 2d 358, 366, 599 N.W.2d 876 (Ct. App. 1999). We review questions of law de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24968 - 2006-06-27
. State v. Holmgren, 229 Wis. 2d 358, 366, 599 N.W.2d 876 (Ct. App. 1999). We review questions of law de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24968 - 2006-06-27
[PDF]
State v. Shannon L.L.
by a trial court's conclusions of law and decides the matter de novo. First Nat'l Leasing Corp. v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8104 - 2017-09-19
by a trial court's conclusions of law and decides the matter de novo. First Nat'l Leasing Corp. v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8104 - 2017-09-19
John K. Bille v. Christine Zuraff
of law that we review de novo. See id. Classification of the residence determines whether Gloria could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8456 - 2005-03-31
of law that we review de novo. See id. Classification of the residence determines whether Gloria could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8456 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI App 44
.2d 449 (1977)). We apply de novo review to the interpretation of a prior order of judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264682 - 2020-08-11
.2d 449 (1977)). We apply de novo review to the interpretation of a prior order of judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264682 - 2020-08-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment is generally discretionary, we review that decision de novo where “the exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=621715 - 2023-02-14
judgment is generally discretionary, we review that decision de novo where “the exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=621715 - 2023-02-14
[PDF]
State v. Timothy B. Panknin
.2d 898, 900 (Ct. App. 1982). Another reason we will review this issue de novo is that we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12519 - 2017-09-21
.2d 898, 900 (Ct. App. 1982). Another reason we will review this issue de novo is that we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12519 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 22
to resume the practice of law presents a legal question we review de novo. See Nottelson v. Wis. Dep't
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48536 - 2014-09-15
to resume the practice of law presents a legal question we review de novo. See Nottelson v. Wis. Dep't
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48536 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Frontsheet
Interpreting and applying Wis. Stat. § 973.046 presents a question of law, which we review de novo. CED
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214321 - 2018-06-15
Interpreting and applying Wis. Stat. § 973.046 presents a question of law, which we review de novo. CED
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214321 - 2018-06-15
[PDF]
WI 54
as de minimis. ¶30 The legislature's choice of language in Wis. Stat. § 70.11(42)(a)2.a. further
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=375405 - 2021-06-08
as de minimis. ¶30 The legislature's choice of language in Wis. Stat. § 70.11(42)(a)2.a. further
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=375405 - 2021-06-08