Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24401 - 24410 of 57152 for id.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, the prevailing defendant—made a prima facie case for summary judgment. See id. ¶11 A defendant establishes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142715 - 2017-09-21

State v. Joseph J. H.
on the basis of whether there was an erroneous exercise of discretion. Id. The circuit court has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6181 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Dane County Department of Human Services v. Kenneth M.
performance was deficient and prejudicial, however, are questions of law we decide de novo. Id. ¶8 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20284 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. John R. Stambaugh
in a revocation of the prior probation. See id. at 87, 423 N.W.2d at 534; see also Beiersdorf, 208 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11922 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
component, a court need not consider the other. See id. at 697. To prove deficiency, Trudelle must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=465863 - 2021-12-21

COURT OF APPEALS
, it is unnecessary to obtain the advice of an attorney about the decision to submit. Id. at 193-94. As Powers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31382 - 2008-01-08

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
argued he could not be convicted “of damaging property in which he has an ownership interest.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191510 - 2017-09-21

State v. Kelly J. Bodoh
erroneous. See id. However, whether counsel’s conduct amounted to ineffective assistance is a question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2982 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] John Vishnevsky v. Dempsey
by a reasonable number of hours.” Id. Our review is limited to whether the circuit court erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2873 - 2017-09-19

Samuel Bonanno v. Lewis Borsellino
is unambiguous, then its construction is purely a question of law. Id. Where a deed is unambiguous, extrinsic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8762 - 2005-03-31