Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24411 - 24420 of 30001 for de.
Search results 24411 - 24420 of 30001 for de.
WI App 72 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2008AP1884 Complete Title of C...
of law we review de novo. Strassman, 225 Wis. 2d at 788. When interpreting a statute, we discern
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36214 - 2011-02-07
of law we review de novo. Strassman, 225 Wis. 2d at 788. When interpreting a statute, we discern
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36214 - 2011-02-07
James R. Sakar v. Georgene Qureshi
denies a litigant a fair trial presents a legal issue which an appellate court determines de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7694 - 2005-03-31
denies a litigant a fair trial presents a legal issue which an appellate court determines de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7694 - 2005-03-31
Charles Johnson v. Rogers Memorial Hospital, Inc.
& Shipping, 202 Wis. 2d 138, 142, 549 N.W.2d 714, 715 (1996). We review questions of law de novo. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13636 - 2005-03-31
& Shipping, 202 Wis. 2d 138, 142, 549 N.W.2d 714, 715 (1996). We review questions of law de novo. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13636 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Sallie T. v. Milwaukee County Department of Health and Human Services
issues. No. 96-3147 9 review de novo. See McEvoy v. Group Health Coop. of Eau Claire, 213
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17176 - 2017-09-21
issues. No. 96-3147 9 review de novo. See McEvoy v. Group Health Coop. of Eau Claire, 213
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17176 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 849 N.W.2d 693. We review de novo the circuit court’s determination that the neighbors’ complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026784 - 2025-10-23
, 849 N.W.2d 693. We review de novo the circuit court’s determination that the neighbors’ complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026784 - 2025-10-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
reviews de novo.’” Hocking v. City of Dodgeville, 2009 WI 70, ¶7, 318 Wis. 2d 681, 768 N.W.2d 552
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86341 - 2014-09-15
reviews de novo.’” Hocking v. City of Dodgeville, 2009 WI 70, ¶7, 318 Wis. 2d 681, 768 N.W.2d 552
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86341 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 24, 2012 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
disagree. Standard of Review ¶11 We consider de novo whether a postconviction motion on its face
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76950 - 2012-01-23
disagree. Standard of Review ¶11 We consider de novo whether a postconviction motion on its face
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76950 - 2012-01-23
COURT OF APPEALS
. Standard of Review ¶10 We review summary judgments de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33294 - 2008-07-02
. Standard of Review ¶10 We review summary judgments de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33294 - 2008-07-02
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
will review this claim de novo. See Szymczak v. Terrace at St. Francis, 2006 WI App 3, ¶¶10-11, 289 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35207 - 2009-02-23
will review this claim de novo. See Szymczak v. Terrace at St. Francis, 2006 WI App 3, ¶¶10-11, 289 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35207 - 2009-02-23
Margaret Henkel v. William West, M.D.
is substantial is a question of law that we review de novo. See id. Since the purpose of maintenance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15271 - 2005-03-31
is substantial is a question of law that we review de novo. See id. Since the purpose of maintenance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15271 - 2005-03-31