Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24411 - 24420 of 61139 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 24411 - 24420 of 61139 for quit claim deed/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that “[t]o the extent that [Sandifer] failed to raise his claims for plea withdrawal in his response
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189235 - 2017-09-21
that “[t]o the extent that [Sandifer] failed to raise his claims for plea withdrawal in his response
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189235 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
-CR 2 cleared. He claims to have protested that he was too drunk to drive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37590 - 2014-09-15
-CR 2 cleared. He claims to have protested that he was too drunk to drive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37590 - 2014-09-15
State v. James L. Holloway
prejudice in an ineffective assistance of counsel claim on the State; (3) whether the trial court should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8115 - 2005-03-31
prejudice in an ineffective assistance of counsel claim on the State; (3) whether the trial court should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8115 - 2005-03-31
Paul R. Sharpley, Jr. v. Paul R. Sharpley III
to claims of trial court error. He claims that the trial court erred in granting Paul III’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4291 - 2005-03-31
to claims of trial court error. He claims that the trial court erred in granting Paul III’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4291 - 2005-03-31
Christina L. Riedlinger v. Joseph C. Riedlinger
and influences of each parent. Contrary to Joseph's claim, the trial court did not disregard the care
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9111 - 2005-03-31
and influences of each parent. Contrary to Joseph's claim, the trial court did not disregard the care
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9111 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that he drive the car off the premises because the parking lots were being cleared. He claims to have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37590 - 2009-07-14
that he drive the car off the premises because the parking lots were being cleared. He claims to have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37590 - 2009-07-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
hearing where he made such an objection. Instead, Vessell claims he made a hearsay objection in his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184781 - 2017-09-21
hearing where he made such an objection. Instead, Vessell claims he made a hearsay objection in his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184781 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of this case, there would be no arguable merit to a claim that the sentence was unduly harsh or excessive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1007609 - 2025-09-11
of this case, there would be no arguable merit to a claim that the sentence was unduly harsh or excessive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1007609 - 2025-09-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
claims for distributions from the fund under its new name. However, another dance company—also named
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245369 - 2019-08-20
claims for distributions from the fund under its new name. However, another dance company—also named
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245369 - 2019-08-20
[PDF]
Paul R. Sharpley, Jr. v. Paul R. Sharpley III
(Ct. App. 1998). ¶6 Paul Jr. confines his appellate arguments to claims of trial court error. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4291 - 2017-09-19
(Ct. App. 1998). ¶6 Paul Jr. confines his appellate arguments to claims of trial court error. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4291 - 2017-09-19