Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24421 - 24430 of 84318 for case number.
Search results 24421 - 24430 of 84318 for case number.
State v. Paul Matek
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-3524
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13059 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-3524
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13059 - 2005-03-31
State v. Paul Matek
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-3524
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11818 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-3524
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11818 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Paul Matek
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-3524 97-2778
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13059 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-3524 97-2778
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13059 - 2017-09-21
James A. Billington v. Wilbert C. Oldenhoff
are in dispute. Selzer, 2002 WI App 232, ¶10. In this case we are required to interpret Wis. Stat. § 632.32
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6943 - 2005-03-31
are in dispute. Selzer, 2002 WI App 232, ¶10. In this case we are required to interpret Wis. Stat. § 632.32
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6943 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Seth P. Hartigan
2005 WI 3 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 03-2118-D COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16803 - 2017-09-21
2005 WI 3 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 03-2118-D COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16803 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
in a police vehicle, and the number of officers involved.” Id. ¶13 “The test for custody is an objective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131990 - 2014-12-22
in a police vehicle, and the number of officers involved.” Id. ¶13 “The test for custody is an objective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131990 - 2014-12-22
State v. Melvin H. Van Zeeland
. Procedural Posture This case has a lengthy and confusing procedural history
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14399 - 2005-03-31
. Procedural Posture This case has a lengthy and confusing procedural history
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14399 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI 29
2008 WI 29 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2007AP2597-D COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32354 - 2014-09-15
2008 WI 29 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2007AP2597-D COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32354 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. James Paul O'Neil
2003 WI 48 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 02-1029-D COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16618 - 2017-09-21
2003 WI 48 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 02-1029-D COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16618 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and the number of officers involved.” Id. ¶13 “The test for custody is an objective one.” State v. Goetz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131990 - 2017-09-21
, and the number of officers involved.” Id. ¶13 “The test for custody is an objective one.” State v. Goetz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131990 - 2017-09-21